您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 腹腔神经丛阻滞

腹腔神经丛阻滞

腹腔神经丛阻滞的相关文献在1991年到2021年内共计72篇,主要集中在肿瘤学、外科学、临床医学 等领域,其中期刊论文68篇、会议论文4篇、专利文献89845篇;相关期刊55种,包括四川师范大学学报(自然科学版)、实用疼痛学杂志、泸州医学院学报等; 相关会议4种,包括第三届全国临床疼痛学术会议暨2009年世界疼痛医师协会中国分会年会、第一届全国临床疼痛学术会议、全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议等;腹腔神经丛阻滞的相关文献由219位作者贡献,包括郑汉光、李军、占强等。

腹腔神经丛阻滞—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:68 占比:0.08%

会议论文>

论文:4 占比:0.00%

专利文献>

论文:89845 占比:99.92%

总计:89917篇

腹腔神经丛阻滞—发文趋势图

腹腔神经丛阻滞

-研究学者

  • 郑汉光
  • 李军
  • 占强
  • 王含芬
  • 王辉
  • 郭继中
  • 付霜
  • 何丽
  • 刘勤发
  • 周俊
  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 马臻杰; 马兰; 贾珍
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨腹腔神经丛阻滞对大鼠肝部分切除术后应激反应及免疫炎性的影响,并阐明其作用机制.方法:取40只大鼠,随机选取10只作为正常组,10只作为阻滞剂对照剂组,20只制备大鼠肝部分切除术模型.取造模成功的16只大鼠,随机分为模型组和模型+阻滞剂组,每组8只.模型+阻滞剂组大鼠于术毕关腹前给予腹腔神经丛双侧注射0.5%利多卡因,阻滞剂对照组大鼠不制备模型,给予腹腔神经丛双侧注射0.5%利多卡因,正常组与模型组大鼠给予腹腔神经丛双侧注射等量生理盐水.给药12 h后,酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法检测各组大鼠血清中皮质酮(CORT)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素1β(IL-1β)和白细胞介素6(IL-6)水平,实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(RT-qPCR)和Western blotting法检测各组大鼠外周血单个核细胞中糖皮质激素受体(GR)、Toll样受体4(TLR4)mRNA和蛋白表达水平.结果:与正常组和阻滞剂对照组比较,模型组和模型+阻滞剂组大鼠血清中CORT、ACTH和NE水平升高(P0.05).结论:腹腔神经丛阻滞能减轻肝部分切除术后大鼠的应激反应及免疫炎性反应,其机制可能与上调GR蛋白表达和下调TLR4蛋白表达有关.
    • 彭立嗣; 王凯旋; 金震东; 郭杰芳; 王东; 陈洁; 李兆申
    • 摘要: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided celiac plexus radiation with iodine-125 (125I) seeds and celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute ethanol for pain relief secondary to advanced pancreatic cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis of 43 patients of advanced pancreatic cancer with moderate to severe abdominal pain in the Department of Gastroenterology,Shanghai Changhai Hospital from January 2017 to April 2018 was performed.20 patients underwent EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN),and 23 patients underwent EUS-guided celiac plexus radiation (CPR) with the implantation of 125I seeds around the celiac ganglia.The postoperative VAS score of abdominal pain,mean analgesic (MS Contin [morphine sulfate]) consumption and complications were compared between the two groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the sex ratio (male/female,10/10 vs 14/9),average age [(64 ± 11) vs (64 ± 12)],lesion location (head/tail,7/13 vs 8/15] and TNM stage (Ⅲ/Ⅳ,9/11 vs 7/16),and the two groups were comparable.Compared with preoperative ones,the VAS score (3.0 points vs 5.5 points) and morphine dosage (30 mg vs 52.5 mg) were significantly lower in the CPN group one week after operation.In the CPR group,the VAS score (5.0 points vs 6.0 points) and morphine dosage (50 mg vs 55 mg) at 2 weeks after the operation were lower than those before the operation;the VAS scores of 4,8 and 12 weeks after the operation decreased to 3.0 points,and the dosage of morphine decreased to 30 mg,25 mg and 30 mg,respectively.The differences were statistically significant (P<0.0001).Compared with the CPR group,at 2 weeks postoperatively the CPN group demonstrated a significantly higher decrease of VAS score (3.0 points vs 2.0 points),degree of morphine reduction (30 mg vs 10 mg) and rate of partial pain relief (70.0% vs 4.3%).However,from 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively,the decrease in VAS score,the decrease in the dosage of MS Contin and the rate of partial pain relief in the CPR group were all significantly higher than those in the CPN group (P < 0.05).There was no complete relief of pain in the two groups.No procedure-related deaths or serious complications were observed and only mild gastrointestinal adverse reactions occurred.Conclusions Two methods can both relieve abdominal pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer safely and effectively.CPR takes effect late but has advantages of good extent and long duration of pain relief.%目的 评估内镜超声(EUS)引导下125I粒子腹腔神经丛放射术和无水乙醇腹腔神经丛阻滞术治疗晚期胰腺癌腹痛的疗效.方法 回顾性分析第二军医大学长海医院消化内科2017年1月至2018年4月间收治的43例伴有中重度腹痛的晚期胰腺癌患者的临床资料,其中20例接受EUS引导下腹腔神经丛阻滞术(CPN),23例接受EUS引导下腹腔神经丛放射术(CPR),即在腹腔神经丛植入125I粒子.比较CPN组与CPR组患者术后腹痛VAS评分、硫酸吗啡控释片用量及并发症发生情况.结果 CPN组与CPR组患者的性别比(男/女,10/10比14/9)、平均年龄[(64±11)岁比(64±12)岁]、病灶部位(头部/体尾部,7/13比8/15)、TNM分期(Ⅲ/Ⅳ,9/11比7/16)的差异均无统计学意义,具有可比性.与术前相比,术后1周CPN组患者VAS评分(3.0分比5.5分)及吗啡用量(30.0 mg比52.5 mg)显著降低;术后2周CPR组VAS评分(5.0分比6.0分)及吗啡用量(50.0 mg比55.0 mg)均低于术前,且术后4、8、12周VAS评分均为3.0分,吗啡用量分别降至30.0、25.0、30.0 mg,与术前比较差异均具有统计学意义(P值均<0.0001).与CPR组比较,术后2周CPN组患者VAS评分下降程度(3.0分比2.0分)、吗啡用量减少程度(30.0 mg比10.0 mg)及腹痛部分缓解率(70.0%比4.3%)均更高(P值分别为0.01、0.005、<0.001);但术后4、8、12周CPR组患者较术前VAS评分下降程度、吗啡用量减少程度及腹痛部分缓解率均显著高于CPN组(P值均<0.05).CPN组与CPR组患者无1例疼痛完全缓解,未观察到严重并发症的发生,仅有轻度消化道不良反应.结论 CPN和CPR均能安全、有效地缓解晚期胰腺癌患者的腹痛.CPR起效时间晚,但疼痛缓解程度及持续时间更具优势.
    • 任尧; 牛杨; 李军; 葛方兰; 杨芸; 李维; 杨永芝; 文冬梅
    • 摘要: To investigate the effects of neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB)on blood glucose and insulin receptor substrate in GK (Goto-Kakizaki)rats,the GK rats were used to establish a non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)model. 5 GK rats before NCPB were randomly selected to be subjected to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)and the liver tissue was excised. The remaining 20 GK rats were randomly divided into two groups:rats in the NCPB group were treated with 0. 5% lidocaine (1mL/1 time/day)for 28 consecutive days,while the control group received the same procedure with physiological saline injected instead of 0. 5%lidocaine. The OGTT were performed after 14 and 28 days. Western blot assay was used to analyze the expression of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1),IRS-2 and phosphorylation of IRS-1 in the liver tissue. After 14 and 28 days of treatment with NCPB,the con-centration of blood glucose in the NCPB group was significantly lower than before NCPB (P<0. 05 or P<0. 05)and the control group (P<0. 01)at 0,60 and 120 min of the OGTT,while the levels of serum insulin exhibited no statistical difference between the control group and the NCPB group. The IRS-1 and IRS-2 expression levels of liver tissue in the NCPB group were significantly higher than con-trol group at the corresponding time points (P<0. 01),which significantly increased compared to before NCPB (P<0. 01). The phosphorylation level of Ser 307 of IRS-1 was significantly lower in the NCPB group than the control group (P<0. 01)at the corre-sponding time points,which declined significantly (P<0. 01)in the NCPB group,while were significantly increased (P<0. 05)in the control group compared with before NCPB. The NCPB treatment can decrease the fasting blood glucose level as well as reduce the degree of impaired glucose tolerance in GK rats. The mechanism may be related to increased protein expression and inhibition of the serine phosphorylation.%观察NCPB对GK(Goto-Kakizaki,GK)大鼠血糖及胰岛素受体底物的影响.构建25只非胰岛素依赖糖尿病(NIDDM)的雄性GK大鼠,随机抽取5只GK大鼠,以NCPB前表示,先进行口服葡萄糖耐受试验(OGTT),然后处死采取肝组织.其余20只GK大鼠随机分为对照组和NCPB组,每组10只.NCPB组给予双侧质量分数0.5%利多卡因进行NCPB,1 mL/侧,每天1次,而对照组以质量分数0.9%生理盐水替换.分别在14 d和28 d后取对照组和NCPB组各5只GK大鼠进行OGTT实验,通过Western Blot检测对照组和NCPB组肝组织中的胰岛素受体底物-1(IRS-1)、IRS-2表达以及IRS-1磷酸化情况.结果表明:NCPB组在14 d和28 d NCPB处理后,在0、60和120 min时的血糖均显著低于NCPB前(P<0.05或P<0.01)和对照组(P<0.01),而血清胰岛素水平与NCPB前和对照组相差不显著;在14、28 d NCPB后NCPB组肝组织IRS-1和IRS-2蛋白表达水平与NCPB前相比均显著增加(P<0.01),在相应时间点并显著高于对照组(P<0.01);而对照组的肝组织IRS-1丝氨酸307残基的磷酸化水平在14、28 d NCPB后与NCPB前均有所上调(P<0.05),NCPB组在相应时间点丝氨酸307残基的磷酸化程度均较NCPB前显著下降(P<0.01),且均显著低于对照组(P<0.01).NCPB可降低GK大鼠的空腹血糖,减轻GK大鼠糖耐量受损的程度,其机制可能与NCPB提高胰岛素受体底物的蛋白表达和抑制其丝氨酸磷酸化有关.
    • 王成刚
    • 摘要: Pancreatic cancer is a malignant digestive system tumor.The incidence of pancreatic cancer is rising,the prognosis is very poor,the mortality rate is extremely high (almost 100%),and the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%.One of the main symptoms of this tumor is pain and mostly neuropathic origin,which significantly decreases the quality of life and the impacts on patient's functional activity.The most common pain treatment for pancreatic cancer is drug analgesia therapy,which is based on the WHO analgesic ladder rule.However,it is not always effective,and many side effects reduce the quality of life of patients.Invasive treatment of pain in pancreatic cancer mainly includes neurolytic celiac plexus block and splanchnicectomy,which can significantly reduce the level of pain and help to improve the quality of life.Invasive remedies should not be applied at the final stage and should be considered in the early stages of the disease (such as the first or second step of the WHO analgesic ladder).This paper comprehensively analyzes the current clinical treatment of pancreatic cancer pain and evaluates its effectiveness,and hopes to provide more information on the treatment of pain in patients with pancreatic cancer.%胰腺癌是一种恶性程度较高的消化系统肿瘤,发病率持续上升,预后极差,5年生存率低于5%,死亡率极高,几乎达100%.胰腺癌主要症状之一是疼痛,大部分属于神经源性起源,显著降低患者的生活质量并影响功能活动.胰腺癌最常见的疼痛治疗是药物镇痛治疗,这是基于WHO镇痛阶梯规则.但是它并不总奏效,且许多不良反应降低了患者生活质量.胰腺疼痛的侵入性治疗主要包括腹腔神经丛阻滞和内脏神经切断术,可显著降低疼痛水平,有助于提高生活质量.微创手术不应在最后阶段使用,应考虑在疾病早期阶段(如WHO镇痛阶梯治疗的第一或第二步).本文综合分析了目前临床上胰腺癌疼痛治疗方法,评估其有效性,希望获取更多对治疗胰腺癌疼痛有帮助的信息.
    • 李雪涛; 陈绍春; 孙俊; 马珂
    • 摘要: 癌性腹痛是一种腹部晚期恶性肿瘤所致的剧烈疼痛,由于其无法从根本上有效治疗,所以对于患者及家属而言是很严重的问题.腹腔神经节阻滞是一种以治疗与诊断腹部脏器疼痛为目的的介入技术,而腹腔神经节接受肝脏、胰腺、脾脏、网膜、直到横结肠的消化道、肾上腺以及肾脏的病理状态下的感觉传入.腹腔神经节阻滞已经运用在肝脏、胰腺、肾脏等脏器的炎症与癌症引起的难治性剧烈疼痛的治疗,理论上它能降低患者对阿片类药物的依赖并提高药物止痛的效果.过去,该神经节的阻滞都是通过触诊骨性标志,辨认局部软组织进行,而现在,各种各样的显像技术被运用在介入治疗疼痛上.X射线透视、计算机断层扫描(CT)、超声内镜可被用于帮助医生们进行腹腔神经节(丛)阻滞.辅助技术的选择依赖于医生们的专业特色,比如胃肠病学者会选择超声内镜技术,内科医生选择介入治疗,影像学医生选择CT引导.该文章是为了描述各种辅助技术的方法及适用范围,以期为难治性剧烈腹痛的患者更好的进行腹腔神经节的阻滞治疗.
    • 马耀宏; 王烯冬
    • 摘要: 目的:研究腹腔神经丛阻滞对大鼠肝部分切除术后残肝炎症反应的影响效果.方法:对30只雄性大鼠行肝部分切除术,然后将其随机分为两组各15例,观察组在术后12h于双侧给予利多卡因(0.5%)行经皮腹腔神经丛阻滞,对照组以生理盐水(0.9%)替换,对比两组肝功能水平与炎症因子表达量.结果:观察组AST(天门冬氨酸转氨酶)、ALT(丙氨酸转氨酶)含量均明显低于对照组,P<0.05;观察组炎症因子IL-β(白细胞介素-β)、TNF-α(肿瘤坏死因子)表达量均明显低于对照组,P<0.05.结论:对于行肝部分切除术大鼠而言,选择腹腔神经丛阻滞可以显著地提升肝功能水平以减少炎症因子,值得推广应用.
    • 魏晓红; 林露; 李军; 牛洁; 刘小燕
    • 摘要: Objective To investigate the effects of neurolytic celiac plexus block(NCPB) on stress response during the early stage of partial hepatectomy(PH) postoperation in rats.Methods Thirty healthy SPF-grade male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into control group and NCPB group,and then were constructed the 70% PH model.NCPB group received NCPB with 0.5 % lidocaine before closing abdominal,and control group received the same procedures,but 0.9% physiological saline was injected instead of 0.5 % lidocaine.The serum concentration of CRP,GC,ACTH,NA and AD,and the levels of serum TNF-α and IL-1β were determined at 6 hours,12 hours and 24 hours after PH.The western blot assay was performed to examine the expression of GR in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).Results The obvious stress response was produced within 24 hours after PH in rats,postoperative serum CRP,GC,ACTH,NA and AD concentrations increased in the different extent,but the NCPB group were significantly lower than those in the control group in the corresponding time point (P <0.01 or P <0.05).The expression levels of GR in PBMCs in the control group were significantly decreased after PH,and markedly lower than those in the NCPB group in the corresponding time point(P < 0.01).The serum TNF-o and IL-1β levels were gradually increased in the control group and NCPB group within 24 hours after PH.But at the respective time points,the levels in the NCPB group were significantly lower than those in control group(P < 0.01 or P < 0.05).Conclusion Intraoperation NCPB can effectively inhibit postoperative stress response at the early stage after PH,and thereby help to reduce the degree of systemic inflammatory response.%目的 观察大鼠肝部分切除术(PH)后给予腹腔神经丛阻滞(NCPB)对早期应激反应的影响.方法 30只健康清洁雄性SD大鼠,随机分为对照组和NCPB组,每组15只,均构建大鼠70% PH模型.NCPB组在PH术毕关腹前给予0.5%利多卡因的NCPB,而对照组以0.9%生理盐水替换.分别于术后6h、12 h、24 h测定血清C反应蛋白(CRP)、皮质酮(GC)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、去甲肾上腺素(NA)、肾上腺素(AD)浓度及肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白介素(IL)-1β水平,并通过Western blot分析外周血单核细胞(PBMCs)糖皮质激素受体(GR)的蛋白表达.结果 PH术后24h内大鼠产生明显的应激反应,术后血清CRP、GC、ACTH、NA及AD浓度均有不同程度的升高,但在相应时间点NCPB组均显著低于对照组(P<0.01或P<0.05);对照组PBMCs的GR蛋白表达在PH术后明显下降,在相应时间点NCPB组均显著高于对照组(P<0.01);无论是对照组还是NCPB组的血清TNF-α和IL-1β水平在术后24 h内均逐渐升高,但在相应时间点NCPB组均显著低于对照组(P<0.01或P<0.05).结论 PH术中给予NCPB可有效抑制术后早期应激反应,有助于减轻全身性炎症反应.
    • 付霜; 曲丕盛; 方军; 袁晓红
    • 摘要: 目的:观察连续膈肌脚后间隙神经阻滞对顽固性上腹部癌性疼痛的疗效.方法:71例中晚期上腹部癌痛患者,随机分单次腹腔神经丛阻滞(NCPB)组(N组)、连续膈肌脚后间隙神经阻滞组(C组)和单独镇痛药物组(D组).观察治疗前、后1周、1、2、4、6个月视觉模拟评分(VAS),吗啡用量和生存质量(QOL)及相关并发症情况.结果:3组治疗前后VAS评分均显著降低(P< 0.01),1周至4个月,N组、C组低于D组(P<0.05),第6个月时,N组、D组差异不显著(P>0.05).治疗后1-6个月疗效优良率D组低于N组、C组(P< 0.05).N组、C组治疗后吗啡用量低于D组,QOL均明显提高(P<0.01).结论:神经阻滞联合镇痛药物优于单独药物治疗.连续膈肌脚后神经阻滞远期疗效及QOL改善优于单次NCPB治疗,可安全应用于临床治疗.
    • 魏小丽; 向梅; 龚伟; 许东强
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨腹腔神经丛阻滞在控制胰腺癌患者疼痛中的效果。方法选择2012年3月—2014年10月在该院就诊的100例采用腹腔神经丛阻滞的胰腺癌患者,采用简明疼痛问卷测量患者采用腹腔神经丛阻滞前后的疼痛情况。结果腹腔神经丛阻滞前患者的疼痛得分为(6.67±1.12)分,阻滞后得分为(2.11±0.49)分,疼痛影响得分术前为(5.81±2.19)分,术后为(1.98±0.51)分,差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。结论腹腔神经丛阻滞可以有效控制胰腺癌患者的疼痛,减少疼痛对患者的不良影响。%Objective To explore the effects of neurolytic celiac plexus block in controlling pancreatic cancer patients’pain.Methods A hundred patients admitted to Xiangyang Central Hospital from March 2012 to October 2014 were recruited into this study.Self -designed demographic questionnaire and Brief Pain Inventory were used to test the pain of patients before and after they underwent neu-rolytic celiac plexus block.Results The pain intensity score was 6.67 ±1.12 before neurolytic celiac plexus block and 2.11 ±0.49 after.Parameters of interference with pain score was 5.81 ±2.19 before and 1.98 ±0.51 after.The difference was statistically signifi-cant(P <0.05).Conclusions Neurolytic celiac plexus block can manage pancreatic cancer patients’pain effectively and lessen ad-verse effects caused by pain.
    • 郭燕春; 王旬果; 陈少平; 刘瑞宝; 王芳
    • 摘要: Objective To explore the efficacy of three dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with solar plexus block in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer pain, and to observe the safety, feasibil-ity and the patients′quality of life. Methods Sixty-three locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients were randomly divided into two groups:the control group (31cases) and the combination group (32cases). In the combi-nation group, ultrasound guided celiac plexus block was first performed. Then three-dimensional conformal radio-therapy was did 2 days later. In the control group, patients were treated with three dimensional conformal radia-tion therapy alone. The pain relief and KPS score were compared between the two groups before and after treat-ment. The security and feasibility of treatment were analyzed. Results The pain relief rates of the control group and combination group were 48.3% and 84.3% respectively. The increasing rate of KPS score in control group was not significant, but in the combination group, it was 56.3%. Conclusion Three dimensional confor-mal radiotherapy combined with solar plexus block technique is better in the treatment of locally advanced pan-creatic cancer patients. It can relieve pain and improve intervention the patient's quality of life.%目的:探讨三维适形放疗联合B超引导下无水酒精腹腔神经丛阻滞术治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的疼痛效果,判断其安全性和可行性及患者生活质量改善情况.方法:应用单因素分析方法,回顾性分析63例局部晚期胰腺癌患者的临床资料, 63例局部晚期胰腺癌患者根据随机数字表分成对照组(31例)和联合治疗组(32例),联合治疗组先行B超引导下腹腔神经丛阻滞术,术后第2 d进行三维适形放疗,对照组则仅采用三维适形放疗;比较两组治疗前后的疼痛缓解情况及Karnofsky评分情况,分析其安全性和可行性.结果:对照组和联合治疗组疼痛缓解率为48.3%和84.3%,对照组卡氏评分没有发生显著变化,联合治疗组卡氏评分提高率56.3%;两组间副反应差异不明显.结论:三维适形放疗联合腹腔神经丛阻滞术治疗局部晚期胰腺癌效果较单用三维适形放疗优越,能够缓解疼痛,提高患者生活质量.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号