摘要：
Objective To study the clinical effect of pulmonary respiratory rehabilitation therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods Selection October 2014 to October 2015 in 110 cases of chronic obstructive pul-monary disease in our hospital treated patients with remission were compared, in accordance with the scheme of pulmonary respiratory rehabilitation taken for each patient according to their scores to A and B two groups. Among them, the A group were treated with routine limb active exercise, while the B group was treated with respiratory muscle exercise, oxygen in-halation, body movement and nutrition guidance. Results There was no difference between A and B two groups in the treat-ment of lung function and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, P> 0.05, no significant difference. After 24 weeks of treatment, the changes of exercise endurance and pulmonary function in patients with B were significantly higher than that in the conventional treatment group, P< 0.05, and the statistical significance was significant. At the same time, the satisfaction of patients with pulmonary respiratory rehabilitation therapy was 96.4% (53/55), which was much better than that of the conventional treatment group 76.4% (42/55), the difference was significant,P< 0.05, B 肺呼吸康复治疗在慢阻肺缓解期患者中的临床效果进行研究é方法择取2014年10月-2015年10月在该院受治疗的110例慢阻肺缓解期患者进行对比研究,依照对每位患者所采取的肺呼吸康复治疗方案的不同将其均分至A、B两组é其中,A组患者采用常规四肢主动运动疗法,B组则采用呼吸肌锻炼、吸氧、全身运动以及营养指导等肺呼吸康复疗法,对比分析A、B两组不同治疗方案对慢阻肺缓解期患者的临床效果é结果A、B两组患缓解期慢阻肺患者治疗前肺功能评分及运动耐力等差异无统计学意义,P﹥0.05,é而在治疗24周后,B组患者的运动耐力变化与肺功能改善状况均显著优于常规治疗的A组,P﹤0.05,差异有统计学意义é同时,采用肺呼吸康复治疗的B组患者满意度达96.4%(53/55),远优于常规治疗的A组76.4%(42/55),差异有统计学意义,P﹤0.05é结论较之常规治疗,采用科学、系统的肺呼吸康复疗法不仅能够显著改善慢阻肺缓解期患者的运动耐力及肺功能情况,而且患者依从性好,满意度高é
