癌,非小细胞肺/放射疗法

癌,非小细胞肺/放射疗法的相关文献在2000年到2021年内共计112篇,主要集中在肿瘤学、特种医学 等领域,其中期刊论文112篇、专利文献276873篇;相关期刊17种,包括医学临床研究、中华放射肿瘤学杂志、中华肿瘤杂志等; 癌,非小细胞肺/放射疗法的相关文献由449位作者贡献,包括于金明、王绿化、张红星等。

癌,非小细胞肺/放射疗法—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:112 占比:0.04%

专利文献>

论文:276873 占比:99.96%

总计:276985篇

癌,非小细胞肺/放射疗法—发文趋势图

癌,非小细胞肺/放射疗法

-研究学者

  • 于金明
  • 王绿化
  • 张红星
  • 李建彬
  • 梁军
  • 冯勤付
  • 吕纪马
  • 周光华
  • 周宗玫
  • 夏廷毅
  • 期刊论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

学科

年份

    • 刘霁; 郝美丽; 谭叶; 江晓虹; 陆海军
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨SPECT肺灌注显像在Ⅲ期不可切除非小细胞肺癌放疗中指导放疗路径、优化放疗计划及保护肺功能方面的应用价值.方法 本研究纳入84例Ⅲ期不可切除非小细胞肺癌患者,随机分为对照组(44例)及观察组(40例).对照组依据常规CT图像制定放疗计划,观察组依据常规CT及SPECT肺灌注显像提示的肺功能信息制定P1、P2计划,但最终均按P2计划进行治疗.比较两组患者放射性肺炎发生率、放疗前后肺功能变化,并对比观察组P1、P2计划的剂量体积参数情况.结果 计划优化后观察组放射性肺炎发生率降低,肺功能下降情况得以改善(均P≤0.001);P2计划在功能剂量参数上有明显改善(P<0.05),且危及器官受量变化不大(P>0.05).结论SPECT肺灌注显像优化调强放疗计划能够在不增加其他危及器官受量条件下,降低功能肺受量,提高肿瘤放疗剂量,对患者的肺功能有保护作用.
    • 中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会; 中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会; 中国抗癌协会放射治疗专业委员会; 中国临床肿瘤学会肿瘤放疗专家委员会
    • 摘要: 随着先进技术的迅速发展,放射治疗已进入精确放疗时代,精确放疗显著提高了肿瘤控制效果、降低了不良反应,对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)不同期别均发挥着重要作用.近年来,靶向治疗、免疫治疗等新疗法取得了突破性进展,为患者带来了生存获益.中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会、中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会、中国抗癌协会放射治疗专业委员会和中国临床肿瘤学会肿瘤放疗专家委员会联合组织相关专家,在NSCLC现有医学证据基础上,结合专家意见制订了《中国非小细胞肺癌放射治疗临床指南(2020版)》,内容主要包括概述、诊断、早中晚期治疗原则、放疗技术和随访等,以期为中国临床医生和患者提供针对放疗的NSCLC循证医学指南,指导临床实践.
    • 穆娅莎·阿布力米提; 梁军
    • 摘要: 肺癌是目前全球最常见的恶性肿瘤,对于局部晚期NSCLC其2年LC率只有20%~40%,故降低LR率,提高OS成为重要研究目标,但对侵及胸壁的早期肺癌术后辅助治疗有一定争议.我们从胸壁解剖学特点、手术方式、失败模式及术后放疗等方面回顾了侵犯胸壁T3 N0-1M0期的NSCLC研究现状.%Currently,lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the world.The local control (LC) rate is only 20%-40% for patients with local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Hence,reducing the LC rate and enhancing the overall survival (OS) are pivotal research objectives.However,postoperative adjuvant treatment for patients with early NSCLC with chest wall invasion is still controversial.In this article,the research progress on T3 N0-1M0 NSCLC with chest wall invasion was reviewed from the perspectives including anatomical features,types of resection,patterns of failure and postoperative radiotherapy,etc.
    • 崔莹莹; 范诚诚; 孙亚楠; 罗辉; 郑晓丽; 杨成梁; 叶柯; 葛红
    • 摘要: 目的 对比立体定向消融放疗(SABR)和手术治疗早期NSCLC的疗效及安全性.方法 回顾分析2012-2016年间河南省肿瘤医院初治且临床资料完整的早期NSCLC患者,共227例,其中SABR组73例,手术组154例.Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并Logrank检验,x2检验分析组间基线资料差异.结果 所有患者均完成治疗,SABR组、手术组3年样本量分别为74、155例.SABR组、手术组3年OS率分别为81.9%、78.2%(P=0.603),3年PFS率分别为66.9%、66.9%(P=0.565),3年局部区域无进展率分别为84.0%、90.8%(P=0.133),3年远处无转移率分别为75.4%、69.8%(P=0.095).结论 SABR与手术治疗早期NSCLC的OS率、PFS率、局部区域无进展率、远处无转移率相近,SABR是不可手术的早期NSCLC患者的可选择治疗方式.%Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and surgery in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods A total of 227 patients who were initially diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC and with complete clinical data admitted to Henan Cancer Hospital between June 2012 and December 2016 were recruited and assigned into the SABR (n=73) and surgery groups (n=154).Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rate and survival comparison was performed using the log-rank test.Chi-square test was adopted to compare the baseline data between two groups.Results All patients completed corresponding treatment.The samples of SABR group and operation group were 74 and 155 cases respectively.The 1-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 97.2%,81.9% and 96.5%,78.2% (P=0.603),respectively.The 1-year and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 90.1%,66.9% and 89.2%,66.9% (P=0.565),respectively.The 1-year and 3-year locoregional recurrence free survival rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 92.8%,84.0% and 96.5%,90.8% (P=0.133),respectively.The 1-year and 3-year distant metastasis-free survival rates in the SABR and surgery groups were 97.2%,75.4% and 89.2%,69.8% (P=0.095),respectively.Conclusions SABR and surgery yield similar OS,PFS,locoregional recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival rates in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC.Therefore,SABR is an alternative treatment for patients with early-stage NSCLC.
    • 袁梦; 门玉; 惠周光
    • 摘要: Radiotherapy is the common traditional treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).In recent years,remarkable advances have been made in immunotherapy,especially the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.How to effectively combine radiotherapy and immunotherapy to maximize the benefit for patients has become a hot topic in clinical research.This article expounds recent research progress in immunotherapy for NSCLC,the effect of radiotherapy on tumor immunology,and the advances and challenges in radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for NSCLC.%放疗是NSCLC传统的主要治疗手段;肺癌免疫治疗特别是免疫检查点抑制剂治疗近年来取得了巨大的进步.如何将放疗和免疫治疗有效结合起来,最大程度让患者获益是目前临床研究的热点.本文就NSCLC免疫治疗现状、放疗对免疫的影响、放疗联合免疫治疗进展和存在的问题进行深入阐述.
    • 吴桂平; 赵婷婷; 张霞; 刘小宇
    • 摘要: 目的探讨后程加速超分割放疗(late course accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy,LCAHR)联合同期化疗在局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer,LANSCLC)中的近期疗效和不良反应。方法选取LANSCLC患者65例,依照数字表法随机分为对照组(n=32,常规分割2. 0 Gy/f,1次/d,5次/周,总剂量66~70 Gy,总治疗时间33~35 d)和研究组(n=33,2个治疗阶段:第1阶段常规分割2. 2 Gy/f,1次/d,5次/周,总剂量57~59 Gy;后进入第2阶段:加速超分割,2. 0 Gy/f,2次/d,8~10次/周,总剂量16~20 Gy;2个阶段累积总剂量73~79 Gy,总治疗时间31~32 d)。两组放疗期间均联合同期化疗,对两组近期疗效、生存时间、不良反应和死亡原因进行比较分析。结果治疗结束随访3~36个月,研究组的治疗总有效率为84. 8%,高于对照组的75. 0%,差异具有统计学意义(P 0. 05)。研究组死亡患者19例,远处转移率24. 2%;对照组死亡25例,远处转移率34. 4%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论 LCAHR联合同期化疗治疗LANSCLC近期疗效较好,可提高肿瘤局部控制率,延长患者生存时间,与常规放疗比较并未增加放疗不良反应发生率。
    • 田学涛; 罗丽华
    • 摘要: [目的]探讨并比较立体定向消融放疗(SBRT)与手术治疗可手术肺癌患者的近远期疗效.[方法]本院收治可手术治疗的Ⅰ~Ⅱ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者67例,39例接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗作为A组,28例接受SBRT治疗作为B组,治疗6个月后评估B组疗效;治疗前和治疗结束后4周评估两组患者功能状态评分(KPS),比较癌胚胎抗原(CEA)、神经特烯醇化酶(NSE)、细胞角蛋白19片段(Cyfra21-1)水平;比较两组1年、3年总生存率和无病生存率.[结果]28例患者经SBRT治疗后,治疗有效率为92.86%(26/28).两组治疗后KPS评分均较高于治疗前,且差异有显著性(P0.05);两组治疗后CEA、NSE、Cyfra21-1明显高于治疗前(P0.05);两组1年、3年总生存率及无病生存率比较差异均无显著性(P>0.05).两组治疗副反应经针对性处理后均消失,无1例因治疗副反应死亡.[结论]VATS、SBRT治疗可手术肺癌患者的近期疗效相同.
    • 别志欣; 郭军
    • 摘要: [目的]探讨同期放化疗与序贯放化疗对诱导化疗无效的局限期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者无进展生存期的影响.[方法]本院收治的108例诱导化疗无效的局限期NSCLC患者随机分为两组,每组54例.A组给予同期放化疗,B组给予序贯放化疗,比较两组患者的不良反应发生率、近期治疗效果、中位生存期以及治疗三个周期后的生活质量评分等参数指标.[结果]①A组疗效远远高于B组(P<0.05);②A组患者中位无进展生存时间显著高于B组(P<0.05);③A组不良反应发生率显著低于B组(P<0.05);④治疗前,两组患者的生活质量评分比较差异无显著性(P>0.05);治疗三个周期后,A组患者的生活质量评分显著高于B组(P<0.05).[结论]同期放化疗能够显著延长诱导化疗无效的局限期NSCLC患者的生存时间,不良反应较少且显著提高患者生活质量.%[Objective]To analyze the effect of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy on progression free survival in patients with limited Non-small-cell Carcinoma (NSCLC) induced by chemotherapy.[Methods]One hundred and eight patients with NSCLC in our hospital were selected as the research object,the patients were randomly divided into group A and group B,each group with 54 cases.The group A received concurrent chemotherapy,the group B was treated with sequential chemotherapy.The adverse reaction rate,the therapeutic effect,the median survival after three cycles of treatment and quality of life score index were compared with between the two groups of patients.[Results]1.The curative effect of the group A was much higher than that of the group B (P <0.05);2.The median progression free survival in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P <0.05);3.The incidence of adverse reactions in the group A was significantly lower than that in the group B (P <0.05);4.Before treatment,there was no significant difference in quality of life between the two groups (P >0.05).After the treatment of the three cycle,the quality of life score of the group A was significantly higher than that of the group B (P <0.05).[Conclusion]Concurrent chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve the quality of life of patients with NSCLC,which has less adverse reactions and higher quality of life scores.
    • 徐忠能
    • 摘要: [目的]探讨同期放化疗与序贯放化疗对局限期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者无进展生存期(PFS)的影响.[方法]74例不能手术切除癌灶的局限期NSCLC患者,分别行同期放化疗(同期组,n=38)或序贯放化疗(序贯组,n=36)治疗.比较两组患者PFS、总生存期(OS)、近期疗效及放化疗副反应发生率差异,比较其治疗前和随访1年时生活质量[肺癌患者生存质量量表(FACT-L)]评估结果及血清肿瘤标志物[癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、非小细胞肺癌抗原21-1(CYFRA21-1)]变化情况.[结果]同期组近期治疗总有效率、PFS和OS均明显高于序贯组(均P<0.05).同期组除白细胞减少、放射性食管炎发生率明显高于序贯组(P<0.05).随访1年时,两组患者FACT-L评分均较治疗前明显提高(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无显著性(P>0.05);两组血清CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1水平较治疗前明显降低(P<0.05),且同期组低于序贯组(P<0.05).[结论]同期放化疗较序贯放化疗更能提高局限期NSCLC患者近期疗效、延长其PFS和OS.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号