办公设备

摘要： 主要技术内容:本文件规定了新型易拉宝便于展示的通用技术规范的术语和定义、结构和工作原理、技术要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输和贮存。本文件适用于新型易拉宝的生产及检验

摘要： 主要技术内容:本标准规定了教育摄像机的一般要求、技术要求和试验方法、检验规则、标志、使用说明书、包装、运输、贮存等

摘要： 主要技术内容:本标准规定了电子面单打印机的技术要求、试验方法以及质量要求等内容。编制大纲主要为：1、术语与定义：电子面单打印机相关术语及定义。2、技术要求：一般设计要求、结构和外观、主要功能和性能、电源适用性、气候环境适用性、电磁环境适用性、机械环境适用性、包装运输跌落适用性、安全适用性、可靠性及关键部件寿命、能耗、噪音、有害物质等。3、试验方法本标准制定了电子面单打印机各技术指标的标准测试方法。4、质量评定程序本标准规定了电子面单打印机在设计定型、量产批次、周期性抽测等检验项目，确保了产品的质量一致性。5、标志、包装、运输、贮存本标准规定了电子面单打印机在标志、包装、运输、贮存方面的相关要求

摘要： 范围:本文件规定了熔融沉积建模（FDM）3D打印机技术规范的术语和定义、技术要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输和贮存。本文件适用于熔融沉积建模（FDM）3D打印机挤出成形的增材制造工艺的桌面型三维模型打印设备,使用其它材质的熔融挤出式桌面三维打印机亦可参照执行本文件。（以下简称“打印机”）;主要技术内容:增材制造  additive manufacturing以三维模型数据为基础，采用材料逐渐累加的方法制造实体零件的工艺。3.2喷头  nozzle3D打印设备的核心部件之一，将打印材料按照控制轨迹熔融挤出到打印平台或上一层打印材料上。一般使用黄铜等导热性能较好的材料。3.3熔融挤出成形  fused deposition modeling将热塑性材料从喷头熔融挤出实现堆积成形的增材制造方法。3.4熔融挤出式桌面三维打印机  fused deposition modeling desktop 3D printer通过软件对三维模型切片生成打印路径，并通过操控打印喷头或其他打印技术，将热熔材料熔融后挤出打印丝并按指定路径层叠形成三维物体的打印设备，其特点是体积小，面向个人及家庭使用，可放于桌面上工作。3.5打印层厚  printing layer's thickness喷头打印一层的厚度。3.6最大成型尺寸  the maximum molding size打印机工作时在X、Y、Z轴上的成型范围。4　技术要求4.1　外观4.1.1　产品外观应整洁，表面不应有凹痕、划伤、裂缝、变形和污染等。表面涂覆层应均匀，不应有明显的起泡、龟裂、脱落、磨损和其他机械损伤。4.1.2　机械件应无裂痕、明显变形，金属零部件不应有锈蚀及其他机械损伤；电气部件应无明显位移或脱落。4.1.3　文字、符号和标识标志应准确、清晰、端正

摘要： 1.1This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office equipment for information technology.1.2Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown inFigs. 1-18, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two more demand functions and supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (seeFigs. 1-18) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (seeFigs. 1-18) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.FIG. 1Demand Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and EquipmentFIG. 2Supply Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and EquipmentFIG. 3Demand Scale A.5.2.1 for Location of Available PowerFIG. 4Supply Scale A.5.2.1 for Power DistributionFIG. 5Demand Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points at WorkstationFIG. 6Supply Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points per WorkstationFIG. 7Demand Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of SupplyFIG. 8Supply Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of SupplyFIG. 9Demand Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal DistributionFIG. 10Supply Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal DistributionFIG. 11Demand Scale A.5.4.2 for RisersFIG. 12Supply Scale A.5.4.2 for RisersFIG. 13Demand Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance FacilityFIG. 14Supply Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance FacilityFIG. 15Demand Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the SiteFIG. 16Supply Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the SiteFIG. 17Demand Scale A.5.5 for Cable PlantFIG. 18Supply Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant1.3The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (seeFigs. 1-18) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.1.4This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.1.5This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in PracticeE1679. The scales in this classification are complimentary to, and compatible with, PracticeE1679. Each requires the other.1.6The scales are intended to identify the levels of various requirements unique to a particular user, and the serviceability (capability) of a building to meet those requirements. The scales thus supplement rather than include code requirements. It remains the responsibility of designers, builders, and building managers to meet applicable code requirements relative to their respective roles in facility design, construction, and ongoing management.1.7The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.1.8This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.9This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ======4.1Each Facility Rating Scale (seeFigs. 1-18) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.4.2This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. Further information may be found in ISO 19208.4.3This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.4.4This classification can be used to estimate the following:4.4.1Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.4.4.2Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.4.4.3Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.4.5Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.4.6This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)4.7This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.

摘要： 1.1This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for special facilities and technologies.1.2Each pair of scales, shown inFigs. 1-4, is for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (DEMAND Scale seeFigs. 1-4) summarizes one level of requirement for serviceability on which occupants might require. The matching paragraph in the Facility Rating Scale (SUPPLY Scale seeFigs. 1-4) is an interpretation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.FIG. 1Demand Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference CenterFIG. 1Supply Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference Center(continued)FIG. 2Demand Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing ProvisionFIG. 2Supply Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing Provision(continued)FIG. 3Demand Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous InterpretationFIG. 3Supply Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous Interpretation(continued)FIG. 4Demand Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave LinksFIG. 4Supply Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave Links(continued)FIG. 5Demand and Supply Scales A.13.5 for Telecommunications Center1.3The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (SeeFigs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.1.4This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.1.5This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but it does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in PracticeE1679. The scales in this classification are complementary to and compatible with PracticeE1679. Each requires the other.1.6The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.1.7This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ======4.1Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.4.2This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.4.3This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.4.4This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet bui and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned.4.5The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.4.6This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)4.7This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.

摘要： 本文件规定了办公设备系列生态设计产品的评价方法、依据和评价单元、评价要求和生态设计产品评价报告。 
本文件适用于下列办公设备系列产品的生态设计评价： 
——办公成像硬拷贝输出设备，包括A4、A3（含A3+）幅面的静电成像设备、喷墨成像设备、模板成像设备、热成像打印机、针式打印机等；
——办公与会议影像设备，包括扫描仪、投影显示设备、照相和录像设备、摄影和放映设备等； 
——文件整理设备，包括装订机、分页机（器）、折页机、打孔机等。

摘要： 主要技术内容:本文件规定了挂式透明卡套的术语与定义、结构型式、基本要求、技术要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输、贮存和质量承诺。本文件的证件卡套为成人、学生（7周岁以上）使用，卡套材质为塑料，搭配挂绳、卡扣，可挂戴于颈部的透明卡套

摘要： 范围:适用于被盖章纸张幅面不大于A4的各类自助设备中需要实现重复盖章功能的自动盖章模块;主要技术内容:外观与结构、盖章数量、印章调整范围、印章复位、走纸速度、卡纸提示、油墨提示、盖章要求、电源适应性、瞬时功率、电磁兼容、环境要求

摘要： 范围:本文件规定了办公用品的分类、术语和定义。本文件适用于办公用品的研发、制定标准、生产和销售过程中对细分品类的分类、名称和术语的规范使用;主要技术内容:文具类办公用品、机具类办公用品、书写类办公用品、记录类办公用品、耗材类办公用品、绘图计算类办公用品、标识类办公用品

摘要： 主要技术内容:本文件规定了金笔的术语和定义、基本要求、技术要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输、贮存和质量承诺。本文件适用于具有蓄贮书写墨水装置、以金合金制成笔尖的商务用自来水笔

摘要： 主要技术内容:本标准规定了再制造企业的一般要求，确立了再制造复印机（包括多功能机）生产的流程，描述了追溯方法和过程记录。本标准适用于再制造复印机（包括多功能机）生产企业开展整机再制造生产活动和内部管理活动以及外部对其生产活动和最终产品的监管

摘要： 范围:本文件规定了智能预警安全柜的系统架构和技术要求，描述了对应的试验方法。本文件适用于智能预警安全柜系统设计、开发、生产、检测及使用;主要技术内容:本标准规定了智能预警安全柜的系统架构，技术要求和试验方法。本标准适用于智能预警安全柜系统设计、开发、生产、检测及使用。本标准的主要技术内容包括：1、安全柜的系统架构；2、安全柜的技术要求：包括工作环境要求、架构中各功能模块的技术要求；3、试验方法：包括试验环境、产品整体检测要求、安全防撬报警试验、设备在位和撤离试验、移动侦测试验和应急供电试验、云平台监控及预警试验

摘要： 主要技术内容:本标准规定了再制造复印机（包括多功能机）的技术要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输和贮存。本标准适用于制造方、使用方以及第三方质量检验机构。本标准不适用于直接连接到三相交流电源的产品

摘要： This document provides background information and guidelines for the development of an ontology for office equipment.An example of how such a standard can be used to automate the identification of resources for colour is provided.NOTE Often the terms vocabulary and ontology are used with the same meaning.

摘要： This document specifies the information to be included in the specification sheets for front projection type data projectors and the form of specification sheets.This document is not applicable to units for a rear screen projection.

摘要： This document specifies accessibility guidelines to be considered when planning, developing and designing electrophotographic copying machines, page printers and multi-function devices. These guidelines are intended to improve accessibility required when primarily older persons, persons with disabilities and persons with temporary disabilities (hereafter referred to as older persons and persons with disabilities) use office equipment.

摘要： This document provides background information and guidelines for the development of an ontology for office equipment.An example of how such a standard can be used to automate the identification of resources for colour is provided.NOTE Often the terms vocabulary and ontology are used with the same meaning.