首页> 外文OA文献 >‘State failure’ and the extraterritorial use of force in self-defence against non-state actors
【2h】

‘State failure’ and the extraterritorial use of force in self-defence against non-state actors

机译:“国家失败”和对非国家行为者自卫的域外使用武力

摘要

The thesis is first and foremost the examination of the notion and consequences of ‘state failure’ in international law. The disputes surrounding criteria for creation and recognition of states pertain to efforts to analyse legal and factual issues unravelling throughout the continuing existence of states, as best evidenced by the ‘state failure’ phenomenon. It is argued that although the ‘statehood’ of failed states remains uncontested, their sovereignty is increasingly considered to be dependent on the existence of effective governments.The second part of this thesis focuses on the examinations of the legal consequences of the continuing existence of failed states in the context of jus ad bellum. Since the creation of the United Nations the ability of states to resort to armed force without violating what might be considered as the single most important norm of international law, has been considerably limited. State failure and increasing importance of non-state actors has become a greatly topical issue within recent years in both scholarship and the popular imagination. There have been important legal developments within international law, which have provoked much academic, and in particular, legal commentary. On one level, the thesis contributes to this commentary.Despite the fact that the international community continues to perpetuate a notion of ‘statehood’ which allows the state-centric system of international law to exist, when dealing with practical and political realities of state failure, international law may no longer consider external sovereignty of states as an undeniable entitlement to statehood. Accordingly, the main research question of this thesis is whether the implicit and explicit invocation of the state failure provides sufficient legal basis for the intervention in self-defence against non-state actors in located in failed states. It has been argued that state failure has a profound impact, the extent of which is yet to be fully explored, on the modern landscape of peace and security.
机译:论文首先是对国际法中“国家失败”的概念和后果的考察。关于建立和承认国家的标准的争议涉及分析在国家持续存在过程中揭示的法律和事实问题的努力,最好的证明是“国家失败”现象。有人认为,尽管失败国家的“国家地位”仍然没有争议,但它们的主权越来越被认为取决于有效政府的存在。本论文的第二部分着重研究失败国家继续存在的法律后果。国家的法律背景。自从联合国成立以来,各国在不违反可能被认为是国际法最重要的单一准则的情况下诉诸武装力量的能力受到很大限制。在学术界和大众的想象中,国家失败和非国家行为者的重要性日益提高已成为近年来的一个热门话题。国际法中有重要的法律发展,引起了很多学术上的关注,尤其是法律评论。一方面,论文为这一评论做出了贡献。尽管国际社会继续延续“国家地位”的概念,当处理国家失败的现实和政治现实时,它允许以国家为中心的国际法体系存在,国际法可能不再将国家的外部主权视为拥有建国的不可否认的权利。因此,本文的主要研究问题是对国家失败的隐式和显式调用是否为干预处于失败状态的非国家行为者的自卫行为提供了足够的法律依据。有人认为,国家失败对和平与安全的现代格局具有深远的影响,其影响程度尚待充分探讨。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blachura A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号