首页> 外文OA文献 >A blessing in disguise?! Discretion in the context of EU decision-making, national transposition and legitimacy regarding EU directives
【2h】

A blessing in disguise?! Discretion in the context of EU decision-making, national transposition and legitimacy regarding EU directives

机译:因祸得福?!在欧盟决策,国家换位和欧盟指令合法性的背景下的自由裁量权

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This dissertation looks into the role of discretion granted by EU directives in EU legislative decision-making and national transposition processes. It applies a qualitative single country-study, focusing on the transposition of six directives in the Netherlands, from the policy areas of consumer protection, environment and justice and home affairs (migration). In the theoretical part the concept of discretion is explored, using insights from both the legal and political sciences. The empirical analysis then presents both EU and national processes regarding the six directives, addressed individually as well as in a comparative manner. This study contributes to clarifying the reasons and circumstances regarding the granting of different margins of discretion to Member States and the effects of discretion on EU negotiations and national transposition. It confirms that discretion can have facilitating and impeding effects on transposition, explains why, and identifies other factors affecting transposition by interacting with discretion. Additionally, a more fine-grained approach to measuring discretion is proposed than hitherto. Finally, but addressed separately from the empirical analysis, the link between discretion and legitimacy is elaborated. It is argued that discretion in national transposition processes can be used to enhance the directives’ input, throughput and output legitimacy within national law.
机译:本文探讨了欧盟指令授予的自由裁量权在欧盟立法决策和国家换位过程中的作用。它采用了定性的单国研究,重点是从消费者保护,环境与正义以及内政(移民)政策领域转移了荷兰的六项指令。在理论部分,将运用法律和政治学的见解来探讨自由裁量权的概念。然后,实证分析介绍了欧盟和国家有关这六项指令的程序,分别以比较方式进行了处理。这项研究有助于弄清授予成员国不同酌处权的理由和情况,以及自由裁量权对欧盟谈判和国家换位的影响。它证实了自由裁量权可以对换位产生促进和阻碍作用,解释其原因,并通过与自由裁量权的相互作用来识别影响换位的其他因素。另外,提出了一种比迄今为止更细粒度的方法来衡量自由度。最后,但与实证分析分开论述的是,阐述了酌处权与合法性之间的联系。有人认为,国家换位程序中的自由裁量权可用于增强指令在国家法律范围内的输入,吞吐量和输出合法性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hartmann J.M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号