首页> 外文OA文献 >'Kometensplitter einer Biographie' die vielstimmige Beweglichkeit der Kunst. Autofiktionales Erzählen in Felicitas HOPPEs Hoppe
【2h】

'Kometensplitter einer Biographie' die vielstimmige Beweglichkeit der Kunst. Autofiktionales Erzählen in Felicitas HOPPEs Hoppe

机译:“传记的碎片”和艺术的复调性。 Felicitas HOPPEs Hoppe中的自动讲故事

摘要

In this thesis I examine in how far, or to which degree, the concept of autofiction can beapplied to Felicitas Hoppe’s text Hoppe (2012). Since the coinage of the term‘autofiction’ by Serge Doubrovsky in the 1970s, there have been many discussions andredefinitions of this possible genre. The discussions include questions regardingdefinitions of autobiography and the novel within the field of literary theory, as well asthe depiction of fact and fiction. Moreover, they ask in how far the knowledge of theimpossibility of capturing ‘reality’ via language technically turns any autobiographyinto autofiction. Various positions regarding these debates, including the thoughts andpositions of scholars such as Philippe Lejeune, Serge Doubrovsky, Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf, and Frank Zipfel, are represented in the first part of this thesis.In the sections that follow, I show how Felicitas Hoppe’s Hoppe is a text thatintertwines ‘factuality’ and ‘fiction’ in a way that it can be interpreted as either orindeed simultaneously both genres (doppeltes Leseangebot) in the sense of FrankZipfel. I point out that from the paratextual features of Hoppe to the tripartite fission of‘Hoppe’ – including the author HOPPE, the narrator ‘fh’, and the protagonist FelicitasHoppe – the text allows and asks with its particular construction for new interpretationsof identity and self-representation.Finally, I conclude with the assumption that Hoppe is a text that might not becompletely captured with present available literary theories. However, the refusal of thetext to being fully assigned to any one particular genre or typology remains one of themany strengths of Felicitas Hoppe’s Hoppe.
机译:在这篇论文中,我研究了自动小说的概念可以应用到Felicitas Hoppe的著作Hoppe(2012)中的程度或程度。自1970年代Serge Doubrovsky提出“自动小说”一词以来,就已经有很多关于这种可能类型的讨论和重新定义。讨论包括关于自传和小说理论在文学理论领域的定义以及对事实和小说的描绘的问题。此外,他们问到通过语言捕捉“现实”的可能性的知识在多大程度上将任何自传转变为自传。关于这些辩论的各种立场,包括Philippe Lejeune,Serge Doubrovsky,Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf和Frank Zipfel等学者的思想和立场,在本论文的第一部分中都有介绍。在以下各节中,我将说明费利西塔斯·霍普的如何霍普是一种以“事实性”和“虚构性”交织在一起的文本,在FrankZipfel的意义上,它可以被解释为或者同时属于两种体裁(doppeltes Leseangebot)。我指出,从Hoppe的超文本特征到“ Hoppe”的三方裂变(包括作者HOPPE,叙述者“ fh”和主角FelicitasHoppe),文本允许并要求以其特殊的构造来对身份和自我进行新的解释。最后,我假设霍普是一个文本,可能无法用现有的文学理论完全捕捉。但是,拒绝将文本完全分配给任何一种特定的流派或类型仍然是Felicitas Hoppe's Hoppe的众多优势之一。

著录项

  • 作者

    Werthmüller Sara;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 de
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号