首页> 外文OA文献 >Reliability and validity test of a Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy
【2h】

Reliability and validity test of a Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy

机译:信息素养计分制的信度和效度测试

摘要

Purpose: The main purpose of the research was to measure reliability and validity of the Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy (Van Helvoort, 2010).udDesign/methodology/approach: Percentages of agreement and Intraclass Correlation were used to describe interrater reliability. For the determination of construct validity, factor analysis and reliability analysis were used. Criterion validity was calculated with Pearson correlations.udFindings: In the described case, the Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of information literate performance.udOriginality/value: Reliability and validity are prerequisites to recommend a rubric for application. The results confirm that this Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy can be used in courses in higher education, not only for assessment purposes but also to foster learning.udOorspronkelijke artikel bij Emerald te vinden bij http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2016-0066
机译:目的:该研究的主要目的是衡量信息素养计分规则的可靠性和有效性(Van Helvoort,2010)。 udDesign / methodology / approach:一致性百分比和类内相关性用于描述人际信度。为了确定结构的有效性,使用了因子分析和可靠性分析。标准有效性通过Pearson相关性计算。 udFindings:在所描述的情况下,信息素养计分规则似乎是评估信息素养表现的可靠有效工具。 ud原始性/价值:可靠性和有效性是建议的前提条件申请细则。结果证实,此信息素养计分规则可用于高等教育课程,不仅用于评估目的,而且可用于促进学习。 JD-05-2016-0066

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号