The essay features in an issue of Bright Light dedicated to the idea of the substrate, and began as a paper in one of three symposia exploring the various interpretative investigations of the substrate, and how it impacts on, and informs different practices. ududAbstract:udHoles in the archive - to fill or to leave, that is the question facing the researcher. The archive contains holes caused by lack of information. The dilemma of what to do when there is a missing link or a hole in evidence, generates new lines of thinking for knowledge production. Lacking hard facts leads to different research tactics, following hunches, reflexive and critical stock taking, asking questions and undertaking interviews. In conducting this process anecdotes surface. These accounts are often perceived to be trivial and of marginal research interest. In contradistinction, I assert the reverse, these hand-holds conjure the possibility of new animations. Penetrating the substrate or as I prefer 'substrata', is like plummeting the archive. This paper presents case studies from Peter Townsend's editorial archive of Studio International magazine where I have employed tactical and dynamic investigative processes.
展开▼
机译：这篇文章的特点是专门针对基材的概念的《亮光》（Bright Light）一书中的文章开始于三个专题讨论会之一，探讨基材的各种解释性研究以及其对不同实践的影响和启示。 ud ud摘要： ud文件中的孔-填充或离开，这是研究人员面临的问题。存档中包含由于信息不足而造成的漏洞。当缺少联系或证据漏洞时该怎么办的困境为知识生产产生了新的思路。缺乏硬事实会导致不同的研究策略，例如预感，反思性和批判性的盘点，提出问题和进行采访。在进行这个过程中，轶事浮出水面。这些说明通常被认为是微不足道的，并且没有什么研究意义。相反，我断言相反，这些把手会让人联想到新动画的可能性。穿透基底或我更喜欢“底层”，就像使档案库直线下降一样。本文介绍了彼得·汤森（Peter Townsend）的《国际工作室》杂志的编辑档案中的案例研究，我在其中采用了战术和动态调查过程。
展开▼
