首页> 外文OA文献 >Online Education, Accrediting Standards, and Student Success: An Examination of the Relationship Between the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges Standards for Online Education and Student Success
【2h】

Online Education, Accrediting Standards, and Student Success: An Examination of the Relationship Between the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges Standards for Online Education and Student Success

机译:在线教育,认证标准和学生成功:南方学院与学校协会关于大学在线教育标准和学生成功的关系的考察

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prior to 2000, there were less than 1.6 million students enrolled in at least one online course. By fall 2010, student enrollment in online distance education showed a phenomenal 283% increase to 6.1 million. Two years later, this number had grown to 7.1 million. In light of this significant growth and skepticism about quality, there have been calls for greater oversight of this format of educational delivery. Accrediting bodies tasked with this oversight have developed guidelines and standards for online education.There is a lack of empirical studies that examine the relationship between accrediting standards and student success. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the presence of Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on College (SACSCOC) standards for online education in online courses, (a) student support services and (b) curriculum and instruction, and student success.An original 24-item survey with an overall reliability coefficient of .94 was administered to students (N=464) at Florida International University, enrolled in 24 university-wide undergraduate online courses during fall 2014, who rated the presence of these standards in their online courses. The general linear model was utilized to analyze the data. The results of the study indicated that the two standards, student support services and curriculum and instruction were both significantly and positively correlated with student success but with small R2 and strengths of association less than .35 and .20 respectively. Mixed results were produced from Chi-square tests for differences in student success between higher and lower rated online courses when controlling for various covariates such as discipline, gender, race/ethnicity, GPA, age, and number of online courses previously taken. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the curriculum and instruction standard was the only variable that accounted for a significant amount of unique variance in student success. Another regression test revealed that no significant interaction effect exists between the two SACSCOC standards and GPA in predicting student success.The results of this study are useful for administrators, faculty, and researchers who are interested in accreditation standards for online education and how these standards relate to student success.
机译:在2000年之前,至少有一门在线课程的注册学生不到160万。到2010年秋季,在线远程教育的学生入学人数显着增长283%,达到610万。两年后,这个数字增长到710万。鉴于这种显着的增长和对质量的怀疑,人们呼吁对这种形式的教育交付进行更大的监督。负责这一监督的认证机构已经制定了在线教育的准则和标准。缺乏实证研究来检验认证标准与学生成功之间的关系。这项研究的目的是研究在线课程中(a)学生支持服务和(b)课程和指导以及学生与南方大学学院协会委员会(SACSCOC)在线教育标准之间的关系。对佛罗里达国际大学的学生(N = 464)进行了原始的24项调查,总可靠性系数为0.94,该调查在2014年秋季参加了24所大学范围的在线本科课程,他们对这些标准的存在进行了评估在他们的在线课程中。利用通用线性模型来分析数据。研究结果表明,学生支持服务和课程及指导这两个标准与学生的成功率均呈显着正相关,但R2小且关联强度分别小于.35和.20。当控制各种协变量(例如学科,性别,种族/民族,GPA,年龄和以前参加的在线课程数量)时,卡方检验得出的混合结果来自较高和较低评分的在线课程之间的学生成功率差异。多元线性回归分析显示,课程和教学标准是唯一导致学生成功独特差异很大的变量。另一个回归测试表明,两个SACSCOC标准和GPA之间在预测学生成功率方面没有显着的交互作用。本研究的结果对于对在线教育认证标准以及这些标准之间的关系感兴趣的管理人员,教师和研究人员非常有用为学生取得成功。

著录项

  • 作者

    Porter Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号