首页> 外文OA文献 >A Q-Methodology Approach to Investigating the Relationship Between Level of Reflection and Typologies Among Prospective Teachers in the Physics Learning Assistant Program at Florida International University
【2h】

A Q-Methodology Approach to Investigating the Relationship Between Level of Reflection and Typologies Among Prospective Teachers in the Physics Learning Assistant Program at Florida International University

机译:在佛罗里达国际大学物理学习助理项目中调查反思水平与未来教师类型之间关系的Q-方法论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this mixed methods study was to understand physics Learning Assistants’ (LAs) views on reflective teaching, expertise in teaching, and LA program teaching experience and to determine if views predicted level of reflection evident in writing. Interviews were conducted in Phase One, Q methodology was used in Phase Two, and level of reflection in participants’ writing was assessed using a rubric based on Hatton and Smith’s (1995) “Criteria for the Recognition of Evidence for Different Types of Reflective Writing” in Phase Three.Interview analysis revealed varying perspectives on content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and experience in relation to expertise in teaching. Participants revealed that they engaged in reflection on their teaching, believed reflection helps teachers improve, and found peer reflection beneficial. Participants believed teaching experience in the LA program provided preparation for teaching, but that more preparation was needed to teach.Three typologies emerged in Phase Two. Type One LAs found participation in the LA program rewarding and believed expertise in teaching does not require expertise in content or pedagogy, but it develops over time from reflection. Type Two LAs valued reflection, but not writing reflections, felt the LA program teaching experience helped them decide on non-teaching careers and helped them confront gaps in their physics knowledge. Type Three LAs valued reflection, believed expertise in content and pedagogy are necessary for expert teaching, and felt LA program teaching experience increased their likelihood of becoming teachers, but did not prepare them for teaching.Writing assignments submitted in Phase Three were categorized as 19% descriptive writing, 60% descriptive reflections, and 21% dialogic reflections. No assignments were categorized as critical reflection. Using ordinal logistic regression, typologies that emerged in Phase Two were not found to be predictors for the level of reflection evident in the writing assignments.In conclusion, viewpoints of physics LAs were revealed, typologies among them were discovered, and their writing gave evidence of their ability to reflect on teaching. These findings may benefit faculty and staff in the LA program by helping them better understand the views of physics LAs and how to assess their various forms of reflection.
机译:这项混合方法研究的目的是了解物理学习助手(LAs)对反思性教学,教学专业知识和LA计划教学经验的看法,并确定看法是否以书面形式预测了预测的反思程度。访谈在第一阶段进行,第二阶段使用Q方法,并根据Hatton和Smith(1995)“不同类型的反思性写作的证据认定标准”,对参加者的写作进行反思。在第三阶段,访谈分析揭示了对内容知识,教学知识和与教学专业知识相关的经验的不同观点。参与者透露,他们对自己的教学进行了反思,认为反思有助于教师的进步,并且发现同reflection反思是有益的。与会者认为,洛杉矶计划的教学经验为教学做准备,但还需要做更多的准备。第二阶段出现了三种类型。一类洛杉矶发现参加洛杉矶计划是有回报的,并且认为教学方面的专业知识不需要内容或教学法方面的专业知识,但是随着时间的推移,它会不断发展。第二类洛杉矶人重视反思,但不写反思,觉得洛杉矶课程的教学经验帮助他们决定了非教学职业,并帮助他们解决了物理知识方面的空白。第三类LA重视反思,认为在专家教学中必须具备内容和教学法方面的专业知识,并认为LA计划的教学经验增加了他们成为老师的可能性,但没有为他们进行教学做准备。在第三阶段提交的书面作业被归类为19%描述性写作,60%的描述性思考和21%的对话性思考。没有作业被归类为关键反思。使用序数逻辑回归分析,发现第二阶段出现的类型学并不能预测写作作业中反映的反射水平。最后,揭示了物理LA的观点,发现了其中的类型学,并且他们的写作提供了证据他们反思教学的能力。这些发现可能会通过帮助他们更好地理解物理LA的观点以及如何评估其各种形式的反射而使LA计划的教职员工受益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cochran Geraldine L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号