首页> 外文OA文献 >The Marriage Debate in Historical Perspective: Changing Norms and the Evolution of Civil Marriage
【2h】

The Marriage Debate in Historical Perspective: Changing Norms and the Evolution of Civil Marriage

机译:历史视野中的婚姻争论:变迁规范与公民婚姻的演变

摘要

THE MARRIAGE DEBATE IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: CHANGING NORMS AND THE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL MARRIAGE, by Charles Kindregan, Jr., Distinguished Professor of Law, Suffolk University Law School, Boston. A work in progress. Continuing a study first written shortly after the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled that marriage licenses must be issued to qualifying same-sex couples and published in the Family Law Quarterly in 2004, the author now reviews additional developments affecting changing attitudes about marriage and its equivalents. These include both American developments such as civil unions and registered domestic partnerships and the American Law Institute’s proposal to treat certain long-term cohabitations as having the same consequences as marriage unless the partners opt out of it. It also examines the growing acceptance of same-sex unions in other countries. Other historical developments discussed in the earlier article are further developed. The conclusion of these studies is that marriage is not now and never has been truly static in American law, and that throughout history attitudes about civil marriage have constantly undergone change.
机译:波士顿萨福克大学法学院杰出法学教授查尔斯·金德雷根(Charles Kindregan,Jr.)正在进行的工作。在马萨诸塞州最高司法法院裁定必须向合格的同性夫妇颁发结婚许可证并于2004年在《家庭法季刊》上发表后不久,作者继续进行首次研究。 。其中包括美国的发展,例如民间工会和已注册的国内合伙企业,以及美国法律学会的建议,除非某些伴侣选择退出婚姻,否则将某些长期同居视为与婚姻具有相同的后果。它还考察了其他国家对同性婚姻的接受程度。先前文章中讨论的其他历史发展得到了进一步发展。这些研究的结论是,婚姻在美国法律中现在不是现在并且从未真正静止过,并且在整个历史中,关于民事婚姻的态度一直在发生变化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kindregan Charles P. Jr.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号