首页> 外文OA文献 >Let Them Eat Fake Cake: The Rational Weakness of China’s Anti-Counterfeiting Policy
【2h】

Let Them Eat Fake Cake: The Rational Weakness of China’s Anti-Counterfeiting Policy

机译:让他们吃假饼:中国反假冒政策的理性弱点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

By many measures China is the world’s largest luxury goods market. China is also widely viewed as the world’s chief counterfeiter and pirate. How can authentic luxury products, with their often-stratospheric prices, have such astonishing success in China when knockoff versions are so widely available? We argue that the answer to this puzzle is two-fold. First, much of the harm assumed to flow from counterfeits in the luxury goods sector is difficult to demonstrate empirically, and there are good theoretical reasons to doubt its magnitude. Indeed, the conventional wisdom about the perils of piracy is more a matter of inference than evidence. There is even some evidence, including evidence from China itself, that counterfeits can strengthen brands as well as undercut them. Second, from a domestic Chinese perspective counterfeits have many virtues. Given China’s enormous income inequality and rapidly urbanizing population, a tolerance for counterfeits can serve important social and political goals. In short, China’s relaxed approach to IP enforcement is a rational strategy—the harms are diffuse and likely much overstated and the benefits are tangible.
机译:从许多方面来看,中国是世界上最大的奢侈品市场。中国也被广泛认为是世界上主要的假冒和盗版。当仿冒版本如此广泛地推出时,正宗的奢侈品以其平常的价格如何在中国取得如此惊人的成功呢?我们认为,这个难题的答案有两个方面。首先,在奢侈品行业假冒所造成的大部分危害很难凭经验证明,并且有充分的理论理由怀疑其规模。确实,关于海盗行为危险的传统看法更多是推理而非证据。甚至有一些证据,包括来自中国本身的证据,都表明假冒伪劣品可以增强品牌价值,也可以削弱品牌价值。其次,从中国国内的角度来看,假冒产品有很多优点。鉴于中国巨大的收入不平等和人口迅速城市化,对假冒商品的容忍可以为重要的社会和政治目标服务。简而言之,中国对知识产权执法采取宽松的方法是一项合理的策略,其危害是分散的,可能被夸大了,其好处是有形的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号