首页> 外文OA文献 >Defending an Unjust System: How Johnson v. Bush Upheld Felon Disenfranchisement and Perpetuated Voter Inequality in Florida
【2h】

Defending an Unjust System: How Johnson v. Bush Upheld Felon Disenfranchisement and Perpetuated Voter Inequality in Florida

机译:捍卫一个不公正的制度:约翰逊诉布什在佛罗里达州如何维护Felon剥夺公民权利和延续选民不平等

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In 2002 the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida decided the case of Johnson v. Bush. The case was brought by local Florida attorneys and the Brennan Center, a civil rights organization based in New York, on behalf of a class of disenfranchised ex-felons in Florida. The class action challenged Article VI § 4 of Florida’s Constitution and additional Florida regulations that denied convicted felons the right to vote. Under the state constitution, disenfranchisement is permanent after commission of a felony unless a pardon is granted by the Governor with the approval of three members of the cabinet. The Plaintiffs asserted that these laws violated the First, Fourteenth, Fifteenth, and Twenty-fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution, Sections 2 and 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffu27s claims of law were denied and the case is currently on appeal.
机译:2002年,美国佛罗里达州南区地方法院判决约翰逊诉布什案。该案是由佛罗里达州的地方律师和位于纽约的民权组织布伦南中心(Brennan Center)代表佛罗里达州一类被剥夺权利的重罪犯提起的。集体诉讼对《佛罗里达州宪法》第VI条第4款和其他佛罗里达州的法规提出了质疑,这些法规否认被定罪的重罪犯有投票权。根据州宪法,除非总督经内阁三名成员的批准给予赦免,否则重罪实施后,剥夺公民权便是永久性的。原告断言,这些法律违反了《美国宪法》的第一,十四,十五和二十四修正案,1965年的《投票权法》第2条和第10条以及《美国法典》第42条。 §1983。原告的法律主张被拒绝,该案目前正在上诉中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Litwin Nathan P.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号