首页> 外文OA文献 >Mysticism and method. Albert Schweitzer's interpretation of the theology of Paul in the light of the 'mystical turn'
【2h】

Mysticism and method. Albert Schweitzer's interpretation of the theology of Paul in the light of the 'mystical turn'

机译:神秘主义和方法。阿尔伯特史怀哲根据“神秘转向”对保罗神学的解读

摘要

This essay is an attempt to study some post-modern theological positions with regard to their growing interest in the use of mystical theology and mysticism in theological research in the academic post-modern world, and to see if the 19th century theologian Albert Schweitzer couldprove a resource for this understanding of mystical theology. This position is known in the essay as ”the mystical turn.”To present the background and understanding of this post-modern view of mystical theology the essay presents three theologians, namely: Andrew Louth, Mark A. McIntosh and Sarah Coakley.These three theologians argue for the use of a contemplative and transforming mysticism as a postmodern epistemology in relation to theological research, with growing concern of the status of theology in the secular and post-modern world. Having made clear the views of these three theologians the essay then presents Albert Schweitzer's view on the mysticism of Paul. Schweitzerhas, in addition to his work on mysticism in general, made a detailed research on the mysticism of Paul which is principally found in his book 'The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle'.This essay shows that a focus on Paul and the New Testament seems to be a missing piece in the argument for the understanding and use of mystical theology as presented by Louth, McIntosh and Coakley. Studying the view of Paul's Christ-mysticism, as understood by Schweitzer, shows that themysticism of Paul connects with the views of these three post-modern theologians in interesting ways. A deeper study in Schweitzer's interpretation of Paul's teaching of the sacraments reveals notonly that Paul's understanding is a product of his Christ-mysticism, but that this mysticism is of the same contemplative form of mysticism as in the ideas produced by Louth, McIntosh and Coakley.The main conclusion of this essay is that Schweitzer's interpretation of Paul's mysticism may well be of use for the post-modern interest in the rehabiliation of mystical theology.
机译:本文试图研究一些后现代神学立场,以期他们对在学术后现代世界中对神学研究使用神秘神学和神秘主义的兴趣日益浓厚,并研究19世纪神学家阿尔伯特·史威哲是否可以证明一个了解神秘神学的资源。在这篇论文中,这一立场被称为“神秘的转折”。为了介绍这种后现代的神秘神学观点,我们介绍了三位神学家,分别是安德鲁·劳斯,马克·麦金托什和萨拉·科克利。这三个人神学家争辩说,在神学研究方面,使用了一种沉思和变革的神秘主义作为后现代认识论,人们越来越关注神学在世俗和后现代世界中的地位。在阐明了这三位神学家的观点之后,本文提出了艾伯特·史威哲对保罗神秘主义的观点。 Schweitzerhas除了一般的神秘主义研究外,还对保罗的神秘主义进行了详细的研究,这主要是在他的著作《使徒保罗的神秘主义》中找到的。这篇文章表明,对保罗和新约的关注似乎这是Louth,McIntosh和Coakley提出的关于理解和使用神秘神学的争论中缺少的部分。施韦策尔了解到,研究保罗的基督神秘主义观点表明,保罗的神秘主义以有趣的方式与这三个后现代神学家的观点联系在一起。在施韦泽对保罗的圣礼教义的解释中进行的更深入的研究不仅揭示了保罗的理解是他的基督神秘主义的产​​物,而且这种神秘主义与劳斯,麦金托什和柯克利所提出的思想具有相同的沉思形式。本文的主要结论是,史威哲对保罗的神秘主义的诠释很可能会用于后现代对恢复神学神学的兴趣。

著录项

  • 作者

    Svensson Joakim;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 swe
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 16:33:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号