首页> 外文OA文献 >Intuitive cooperation refuted: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014)
【2h】

Intuitive cooperation refuted: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014)

机译:直觉合作被驳斥:Rand等人的评论。 (2012年)和兰特等人。 (2014)

摘要

We show that Rand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014)—who argue that cooperation is intuitive—provide an incorrect interpretation of their own data. They make the mistake of inferring intuition from relative decision times alone, without taking into account absolute decision times. We re-examine their data and find that the vast majority of their responses are slow, exceeding four seconds, even in time-pressure treatments intended to promote intuitive responses. Further, a plot of the average cooperation rates by decision time presents no clearrelationship between decision time and cooperation. However, among the few decisions that were relatively fast (less than four seconds), there appears to be a positive—not negative—correlation between decision time and cooperation. We conclude that the data presented byRand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014) fail to provide evidence for the hypothesis that cooperation is intuitive. If anything, their data indicate the opposite.
机译:我们证明兰德等。 (2012年)和兰德等。 (2014年),他认为合作是直观的,对他们自己的数据提供了错误的解释。他们犯了错误,即仅从相对决策时间推断直觉,而没有考虑绝对决策时间。我们重新检查了他们的数据,发现他们的绝大多数响应都是缓慢的,超过了4秒,即使在旨在促进直观响应的时间压力处理中也是如此。此外,按决策时间绘制的平均合作率图表在决策时间与合作之间没有明确的关系。但是,在相对较快(少于四秒)的少数决策中,决策时间与合作之间似乎存在正相关而非负相关。我们得出的结论是,Rand等人提供的数据。 (2012年)和兰德等。 (2014)未能为合作是直观的假设提供证据。如果有的话,它们的数据则相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号