首页> 外文OA文献 >Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load
【2h】

Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load

机译:把他人留在我们心中还是在我们心中?认知负荷下的分配游戏

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has recently been argued that giving is spontaneous while greed is calculated (Rand et al. 2012). If greed is calculated we would expect that cognitive load, which is assumed to reducethe influence of cognitive processes, should affect greed. In this paper we study bothcharitable giving and the behavior of dictators under high and low cognitive load, to test ifgreed is affected by the load. In the dictator games we use both a give frame, where thedictators are given an amount that they may share with a partner, and a take frame, wheredictators may take from an amount initially allocated to the partner. The results showconsistently that the behavioral effect in terms of allocated money of the induced load is small if at all existent. At the same time, follow-up questions indicate that the subjects’ decisions are more driven by their feelings and less driven by their thoughts under cognitive load.
机译:最近有人争辩说,在计算贪婪的同时,捐赠是自发的(Rand等人,2012)。如果计算出贪婪,我们期望认知负荷(它会减少认知过程的影响)会影响贪婪。本文研究了在高和低认知负荷下的慈善捐赠和独裁者的行为,以检验贪婪是否受负荷的影响。在独裁者游戏中,我们既使用给予框架(可以给独裁者提供与合伙人共享的金额),也可以使用获取框架(可以使独裁者从最初分配给合伙人的金额中获得收益)。结果一致地表明,如果根本不存在的话,就诱导负载分配资金而言,行为效应很小。同时,后续问题表明,在认知负荷下,受试者的决定更多地取决于他们的感受,而较少地取决于其思想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号