首页> 外文OA文献 >“We are more hands-on, we are more practical” - A case study on institutional frames of social work, and their possible consequences on the relationship between the professional and client.
【2h】

“We are more hands-on, we are more practical” - A case study on institutional frames of social work, and their possible consequences on the relationship between the professional and client.

机译:“我们更亲力亲为,我们更实际” - 一个关于社会工作体制框架的案例研究,以及它们对专业人士与客户之间关系的可能后果。

摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate the institutional frames of social work in Uganda and to discuss their possible consequences for the professional-client relationship. Theoretically our analysis draws on two different perspectives, which we have chosen to call “promoting formal frames in social work” and “promoting relation-based social work”. Empirically the analysis is based on a case study of an NGO in Kampala, Uganda, which works with helping abandoned pregnant teenagers.In this study, a qualitative approach is employed which makes use of method triangulation by combining interviews, participant observations and document analysis. The results indicate that our professional informants experience relation-based social work with weak formal frames. These settings seem to promote flexibility and to allow for the adoption of an individual perspective for each client. On the other hand legal rights for clients seem to be nonexistent and decisions apparently have a risk to be made out of arbitrariness. The conclusion of this study is that social work in Uganda is regulated by other frames than formal ones. It seems impossible to execute social work without any institutional frames. With less formal regulation there is more room for informal norms to affect social work. In the Ugandan context certain religious and cultural norms seem to have a major influence.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查乌干达社会工作的制度框架,并讨论其对专业与客户关系的可能后果。从理论上讲,我们的分析基于两种不同的观点,我们选择将其称为“促进社会工作中的正式框架”和“促进基于关系的社会工作”。基于经验的分析是基于乌干达坎帕拉的一个非政府组织的案例研究,该组织致力于帮助被遗弃的怀孕青少年。本研究采用定性方法,通过访谈,参与者观察和文档分析相结合的方法进行三角剖分。结果表明,我们的专业线人在非正式框架下体验了基于关系的社会工作。这些设置似乎可以提高灵活性,并允许每个客户采用各自的观点。另一方面,客户的法律权利似乎不存在,而决策显然具有任意性的风险。这项研究的结论是,乌干达的社会工作受到正式框架以外其他框架的监管。没有任何体制框架,似乎不可能执行社会工作。由于非正式法规较少,非正式规范影响社会工作的空间更大。在乌干达语境中,某些宗教和文化规范似乎具有重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号