首页> 外文OA文献 >The Ethics of Investing. Making Money or Making a Difference?
【2h】

The Ethics of Investing. Making Money or Making a Difference?

机译:投资伦理。赚钱还是有所作为?

摘要

The concepts of 'ethical' and 'socially responsible' investment (SRI) have become increasingly popular in recent years and funds which offer this kind of investment have attracted many individual investors. The present book addresses the issue of 'How ought one to invest?' by critically engaging with the ideas of the proponents of this movement about what makes 'ethical' investing ethical. The standard suggestion that ethical investing simply consists in refraining from investing in certain 'morally unacceptable companies' is criticised for being both too rigid (often resting on absolute moral rules which lead to an austere conclusion) and too ineffective for individual investors (investors who after all control only a small part of the investment universe). Furthermore, the idea that ethical investing could consist in engaging more actively with the companies one invests in, in order to make them change their ways and become more socially responsible, is criticised for being just as ineffective for individual investors. Some more radical alternatives are elaborated on and defended - for instance, the suggestion that investors should make as much money from their investments as possible and then donate the proceeds to socially worthwhile charities. From similar suggestions, the common idea that there is no conflict between morality and profitability, or that genuinely ethical investing can be just as profitable as mainstream investing, is criticised for being too naïve. Making a difference may indeed require personal sacrifice of investors, but it is argued that the needs of the possible recipients of philanthropy are morally more important than the luxury of investment returns.
机译:近年来,“道德”和“社会责任”投资(SRI)的概念变得越来越流行,提供这种投资的基金吸引了许多个人投资者。本书探讨了“应该如何进行投资?”这一问题。通过批判性地与该运动的支持者的思想进行互动,以了解使“道德”投资成为道德的原因。有人批评道德投资只是指不投资某些“道德上不可接受的公司”的标准建议被批评为既过于僵化(通常遵循绝对道德规则,导致得出朴实的结论)又对个人投资者(在投资之后全部只控制投资领域的一小部分)。此外,人们批评道德投资可能包含更积极地与自己投资的公司互动,以使他们改变方式并变得更具社会责任感的想法,因为这种想法对个人投资者而言同样无效。提出并辩护了一些更激进的替代方案-例如,建议投资者应从其投资中赚取尽可能多的钱,然后将收益捐赠给具有社会价值的慈善机构。从类似的建议中,人们普遍认为道德与获利能力之间不存在冲突,或者说真正的道德投资可以与主流投资一样获利,这被认为过于幼稚。有所作为可能确实需要投资者作出个人牺牲,但是有人认为,可能的慈善接受者的需求在道德上比投资收益的奢侈更重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sandberg Joakim;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号