首页> 外文OA文献 >The Accountability of Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Violations: A comparative analysis of legal redress under the US Alien Tort Claims Act
【2h】

The Accountability of Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Violations: A comparative analysis of legal redress under the US Alien Tort Claims Act

机译:跨国公司对侵犯人权行为的责任:美国外国人侵权索赔法案下法律救济的比较分析

摘要

The US Alien Tort Claims Act renders vindication to foreign claimants of gross human rights violations committed by multinational corporations. The Act was first employed on State defendants yet US courts now permit claims against private corporations. This development has brought serious allegations against several of the world’s largest corporations. Some of the allegations concern severe infringements of human rights such as mass murder, rape and genocide, while other cases address freedom of speech and expression. The Act provides civil remedies and distinguishes from legislation in other parts of the world. There are important procedural hurdles to impose litigation, nonetheless the Act has instigated a debate on the risks involved with transnational corporate activities. While several cases have been dismissed and other settled, corporate aiding and abetting is the most prosecuted field of the litigation under the Act.The US Alien Tort Claims Act derives its support from international law and thus both domestic as well as international law is imperative for its interpretation. The implication of initiatives from the United Nations, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development as well as the European Union are discussed in a comparative manner. Several mechanisms have been proposed to attain greater corporate accountability, ranging from voluntary codes of conduct to binding international instruments. As corporations have become powerful global actors, the importance of foreign investments has developed into a discussion on the impact of multinational corporations in the global market and especially the implication of human rights. This thesis will discuss the current developments of accountability of multinational corporations with the starting point in the US Alien Tort Claims Act, a revision of the case law, and the importance of international and regional instruments especially in the European Union as well as United Nations and OECD.
机译:美国《外国人侵权索赔法》为外国索赔人证明了跨国公司犯下的严重侵犯人权行为。该法案最初适用于州被告,但美国法院现在允许对私人公司提起诉讼。这一发展已经对世界上几家最大的公司提出了严厉的指控。一些指控涉及严重侵犯人权,例如大规模谋杀,强奸和种族灭绝,而其他案件涉及言论自由和言论自由。该法规定了民事补救办法,并与世界其他地区的立法区别开来。实施诉讼存在重要的程序障碍,尽管如此,该法案已引发了有关跨国公司活动所涉及风险的辩论。虽然该案已被驳回并结案,但根据该法,公司的协助和教is是诉讼中最受起诉的领域。美国《外国人侵权索赔法》得到了国际法的支持,因此,无论是国内法还是国际法都必须遵守该法。它的解释。比较地讨论了联合国,经济合作与发展组织以及欧洲联盟的倡议的含义。已提出了几种机制来实现更大的公司问责制,从自愿行为守则到具有约束力的国际文书。随着公司成为强大的全球参与者,外国投资的重要性已发展成为讨论跨国公司在全球市场上的影响,尤其是对人权的影响的讨论。本文将以美国《外国人侵权索赔法》的起点,对判例法的修订以及国际和地区文书的重要性,尤其是在欧盟,联合国以及联合国和国际劳工组织中的重要性,来讨论跨国公司问责制的最新发展。经合组织。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dimitrieva Natalia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号