首页> 外文OA文献 >'We value it because it is only on the earth that you can put your feet' A case study of landscape values and perspectives in the Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro Sécure highway conflict
【2h】

'We value it because it is only on the earth that you can put your feet' A case study of landscape values and perspectives in the Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro Sécure highway conflict

机译:“我们重视它,因为只有在地球上你才能站稳脚跟”一个关于土着领地和国家公园Isiborosécure公路冲突的景观价值观和观点的案例研究

摘要

This is a bachelor’s thesis in human geography conducted as a minor field study in the Bolivian Amazon. The aim of the thesis is to examine user values and perspectives of representatives of the Mojeño indigenous people regarding their territory and how these are considered in negotiations with the Bolivian government resulting from protests of a highway project planned to cross the habitat. The territory is the Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro Sécure, home of the Mojeño, Yuracaré and Tsimane indigenous peoples. The thesis is based on landscape and place theory and theory on political ecology. Central aspects have been identified and put into a theoretical framework. The methods used are qualitative semi-structured interviews with Mojeño indigenous’ representatives, field observations and document studies of the Law that were the result of the negotiations. The results are presented and analyzed in relation to the theoretical framework. The conclusions drawn are that the user values and perspectives are mainly focused on the rights to self-determination and livelihood. There is an underlying perception of the area as inherently theirs because of cultural and religious history, incorporating the area into their identification of themselves. A dissonance is shown between the user values and perspectives presented in the interviews and the document studies of the negotiated Law. The natural environment and its ecological function are given more focus in the Law as well as in the conflict itself than it is given in the interviews. The central term of analysis is the term “inviolable”. The interpretation of the term will determine how the Law is interpreted and in prolongation, how the user values and perspectives have been taken in consideration.
机译:这是在玻利维亚亚马逊地区进行的次要实地研究,是人类地理学的学士学位论文。本文的目的是研究用户价值和莫希尼奥土著人民代表关于其领土的观点,以及在抗议计划穿越栖息地的高速公路项目引起的与玻利维亚政府的谈判中如何考虑这些价值和观点。该领土是土著领土和国家公园伊西伯勒·塞古尔(IsiboroSécure),是莫耶尼奥(Mojeño),尤拉卡雷(Yuracaré)和蒂马尼(Tsimane)土著人民的家。本文基于风景园林理论和政治生态学理论。已经确定了中心方面并将其纳入理论框架。所使用的方法是与莫杰尼奥土著代表进行的定性半结构化访谈,实地观察和谈判所得的法律文献研究。提出并分析了与理论框架有关的结果。得出的结论是,用户价值和观点主要集中在自决权和生计权上。由于文化和宗教历史的原因,对该地区有一种固有的感知,将其纳入自己的身份识别中。在访谈中所显示的用户价值和观点与协商法律的文献研究之间显示出不一致。与采访相比,法律和冲突本身更加关注自然环境及其生态功能。分析的中心术语是“不可侵犯”。该术语的解释将决定法律的解释方式以及延伸时间,以及如何考虑用户价值和观点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Westman Ida;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号