首页> 外文OA文献 >The Metallicity Distribution and Hot Jupiter Rate of the Kepler Field: Hectochelle High-Resolution Spectroscopy for 776 Kepler Target Stars
【2h】

The Metallicity Distribution and Hot Jupiter Rate of the Kepler Field: Hectochelle High-Resolution Spectroscopy for 776 Kepler Target Stars

机译:开普勒场的金属分布和热木星率:776 Kepler目标星的Hectochelle高分辨率光谱

摘要

The occurrence rate of hot Jupiters from the Kepler transit survey is roughly half that of radial velocity surveys targeting solar neighborhood stars. One hypothesis to explain this difference is that the two surveys target stars with different stellar metallicity distributions. To test this hypothesis, we measure the metallicity distribution of the Kepler targets using the Hectochelle multi-fiber, high-resolution spectrograph. Limiting our spectroscopic analysis to 610 dwarf stars in our sample with log g > 3.5, we measure a metallicity distribution characterized by a mean of [M/H][subscript mean] = -0.045±0.009, in agreement with previous studies of the Kepler field target stars. In comparison, the metallicity distribution of the California Planet Search radial velocity sample has a mean of [M/H][subscript CPS,mean] = -0.005±0.006, and the samples come from different parent populations according to a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. We refit the exponential relation between the fraction of stars hosting a close-in giant planet and the host star metallicity using a sample of dwarf stars from the California Planet Search with updated metallicities. The best-fit relation tells us that the difference in metallicity between the two samples is insufficient to explain the discrepant hot Jupiter occurrence rates; the metallicity difference would need to be sime0.2–0.3 dex for perfect agreement. We also show that (sub)giant contamination in the Kepler sample cannot reconcile the two occurrence calculations. We conclude that other factors, such as binary contamination and imperfect stellar properties, must also be at play.
机译:开普勒过渡调查得出的木星高温的发生率大约是针对太阳附近恒星的径向速度调查的一半。一种解释这种差异的假设是,两次调查的目标是恒星金属性分布不同的恒星。为了验证这一假设,我们使用Hectochelle多纤维高分辨率光谱仪测量开普勒靶的金属分布。将我们的光谱分析限制在样本中log g> 3.5的610个矮星中,我们测量了特征为[M / H] [下标平均值] = -0.045±0.009的平均值的金属分布,这与开普勒先前的研究一致野外目标星。相比之下,“加州行星搜索”径向速度样本的金属度分布的平均值为[M / H] [下标CPS,平均值] = -0.005±0.006,并且根据Kolmogorov–Smirnov检验,样本来自不同的母体。我们使用来自加州行星搜索的更新后的金属性样本,对容纳近距离巨型行星的恒星分数与宿主恒星金属性之间的指数关系进行了修正。最佳拟合关系告诉我们,两个样品之间的金属性差异不足以解释木星热的出现率差异。为了达到完美的一致性,金属度差异将需要为sime0.2–0.3 dex。我们还表明,开普勒样本中的(亚)巨型污染无法调和两次出现的计算。我们得出结论,其他因素,例如二进制污染和不完美的恒星特性,也必须发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号