首页> 外文OA文献 >The associations between QCT-based vertebral bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures depend on the spinal locations of both bone measurement and fracture
【2h】

The associations between QCT-based vertebral bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures depend on the spinal locations of both bone measurement and fracture

机译:基于QCT的椎骨测量与普遍的椎骨骨折之间的关联取决于骨测量和骨折的脊柱位置

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

SummaryWe examined how spinal location affects the relationships between quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures. Upper spine (T4–T10) fractures appear to be more strongly related to bone measures than lower spine (T11–L4) fractures, while lower spine measurements are at least as strongly related to fractures as upper spine measurements.IntroductionVertebral fracture (VF), a common injury in older adults, is most prevalent in the mid-thoracic (T7–T8) and thoracolumbar (T12–L1) areas of the spine. However, measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) are typically made in the lumbar spine. It is not clear how the associations between bone measurements and VFs are affected by the spinal locations of both bone measurements and VF.MethodsA community-based case–control study includes 40 cases with moderate or severe prevalent VF and 80 age- and sex-matched controls. Measures of vertebral BMD, strength (estimated by finite element analysis), and factor of risk (load:strength ratio) were determined based on QCT scans at the L3 and T10 vertebrae. Associations were determined between bone measures and prevalent VF occurring at any location, in the upper spine (T4–T10), or in the lower spine (T11–L4).ResultsPrevalent VF at any location was significantly associated with bone measures, with odds ratios (ORs) generally higher for measurements made at L3 (ORs = 1.9–3.9) than at T10 (ORs = 1.5–2.4). Upper spine fracture was associated with these measures at both T10 and L3 (ORs = 1.9–8.2), while lower spine fracture was less strongly associated (ORs = 1.0–2.4) and only reached significance for volumetric BMD measures at L3.ConclusionsCloser proximity between the locations of bone measures and prevalent VF does not strengthen associations between bone measures and fracture. Furthermore, VF etiology may vary by region, with VFs in the upper spine more strongly related to skeletal fragility.
机译:总结我们研究了脊柱位置如何影响基于定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)的骨测量结果与普遍的椎骨骨折之间的关系。上脊柱(T4–T10)骨折似乎比下脊柱(T11–L4)骨折与骨测量的关系更密切,而下脊柱测量与骨折的关系至少与上脊柱测量的密切相关。老年人常见的伤害,最常见于脊柱的胸中段(T7–T8)和胸腰段(T12–L1)。但是,通常在腰椎中进行骨矿物质密度(BMD)的测量。尚不清楚骨骼测量值和VF之间的关联如何受骨骼测量值和VF的脊柱位置影响。方法一项基于社区的病例对照研究包括40例中度或重度流行VF以及80例年龄和性别相匹配的病例。控件。基于L3和T10椎骨的QCT扫描,确定椎骨BMD,强度(通过有限元分析估算)和危险因素(负荷:强度比)的量度。确定了在任何位置,上脊柱(T4–T10)或下脊柱(T11–L4)发生的骨测量值与普遍的VF之间的关联。结果在任何位置,普遍的VF与骨测量值显着相关,具有优势比。在L3(ORs = 1.9-3.9)进行的测量(ORs)通常比T10(ORs = 1.5-2.4)更高。在T10和L3时,上脊柱骨折均与这些措施相关(ORs = 1.9-8.2),而下脊柱骨折的相关性较弱(ORs = 1.0-2.4),仅对L3处的BMD体积测量有意义。骨量度和普遍的VF的位置并不能加强骨量度与骨折之间的关联。此外,VF病因可能因地区而异,上脊柱中的VF与骨骼脆弱性更密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号