首页> 外文OA文献 >Trade-off/Positional Analysis (with a Rawlsian Approach to Equity) as an Alternative to Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) in Socio-technical Decisions
【2h】

Trade-off/Positional Analysis (with a Rawlsian Approach to Equity) as an Alternative to Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) in Socio-technical Decisions

机译:权衡/定位分析(采用罗尔斯式公平方法)作为社会技术决策中成本效益分析(CBa)的替代方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper introduces a hybrid trade-off/positional analysis framework as an alternative to cost-benefit analysis (CBA). As a decision-support tool, the proposed framework [1] allows decision-makers not to monetize or aggregate non-monetary factors over time; [2] invites the entrance of stakeholders into the debate since there is greater transparency as to who benefits and who is harmed by a particular policy/program/project; [3] enables analysts to undertake a comparative analysis of alternatives over time; and [4] takes into account the important role of technological change in shaping the state and performance of a system. In addition, a Rawlsian approach to incorporating equity into decision-making is advocated.
机译:本文介绍了一种权衡/位置混合分析框架,以替代成本效益分析(CBA)。作为决策支持工具,建议的框架[1]允许决策者不要随着时间的推移而货币化或汇总非货币因素; [2]鼓励利益相关者参加辩论,因为在特定政策/计划/项目的受益人和受害人方面存在更大的透明度; [3]使分析人员可以对替代方案进行长期的比较分析;文献[4]考虑了技术变革在塑造系统状态和性能中的重要作用。另外,提倡一种将权益纳入决策的罗尔斯式方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号