首页> 外文OA文献 >Modelling Of Downhole Seismic Sources II: An Analysis Of The Heelan/Brekhovskikh Results And Comparison Of Point Source Radiation To Radiation From Boreholes
【2h】

Modelling Of Downhole Seismic Sources II: An Analysis Of The Heelan/Brekhovskikh Results And Comparison Of Point Source Radiation To Radiation From Boreholes

机译:井下地震源模拟II:Heelan / Brekhovskikh结果分析及点源辐射对钻孔辐射的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The work of Heelan (1952, 1953a,b) was one of the first studies of wave propagationfrom a cylindrical boundary. Heelan attempted to model the radiation emanating froma cylindrical shot hole filled with dynamite. To do so he applied a constant stress toa finite length of an empty infinite cylindrical cavity embedded in an infinite elastic,homogeneous medium. The stresses he considered were axial, torsional, and radialstresses. The radial and axial stresses were required to be proportional to each otherand of the same duration.To date Heelan's work has been referenced in over 100 articles and 15 differentjournals including recent works (Paulsson, 1988) . His results have also been comparedwith results from the reciprocity theorem (White, 1953, 1960) and played an integralpart of important books including those by Brekhovskikh (1960, 1980) and White(1965, 1983). His fundamental contributions were the description of shear wave lobes,the famous four-leaved rose, generated from a radial source in a borehole and that theradiation patterns for an axial source and a torsional source in a borehole have thesame geometries as the point axial and torsional sources in infinite media.Despite the importance of this work, Heelan's results have been criticized by Jordan(1962) who dismissed the work as mathematically unsound and Abo-Zena (1977) whodevoted an appendix of his 1977 paper to criticizing Heelan's results. The main pointof contention has been the use of contour analysis in his first paper (Heelan, 1953a).Although Heelan's work did not include a fluid-filled borehole which is a crucialomission for our purposes, his work may nonetheless be seen as a starting point for themodelling of downhole seismic sources. For instance, Lee and Balch (1982) developedradiation patterns for fluid boreholes which were simple extensions of Heelan's results.Additionally, one particular application of Heelan's theory is in the preliminary development of downhole seismic Sources that often require dry holes until the electronics can be properly shielded. For that reason, an exhaustive examination of the mathematics and physics that went into Heelan's first paper was undertaken to determine if his formulation was correct.The fundamental basis of Heelan's work was a variant of the Sommerfeld integral,an integral of cylindrical waves, in which he unfortunately did not specify the contour.To overcome this obstacle of an unknown contour a parallel method suggested byBrekhovskikh (1960, 1980) was implemented. Brekhovskikh used the Weyl integral,an integral over plane waves, to duplicate Heelan's results for the radial and torsionalstresses. However he does no justification of the extensive algebra or analysis involvedand does not include the effects of axial stress. Thus in this paper, we have completedand elucidated the work that Brekhovskikh initiated and moreover indirectly verifiedthat Heelan's results were correct.Additionally, we found that Abo-Zena's and Heelan's initial formulations wereequivalent. The only difference was in a reversal of the separation of variables procedure necessary to replicate this work and also in Abo-Zena's USe of the Laplacetransform where Heelan used the Fourier transform. However, Abo-Zena's results doextend Heelan's by allowing the source function to vary over the distance in which itis applied. The far field results of Abo-Zena and Heelan are equivalent (White, 1983)only if a 1/μ correction is applied to Abo-Zena's results.The first half of this paper is very involved mathematically but much of the algebrais relegated to Appendix A. Having verified that Heelan's results were correct we thenproceed to compare Heelan's results with well established point source representationsknown in the literature (White, 1983) and also with radiation patterns from pointsources and stress sources in a fluid-filled borehole (Lee and Balch, 1982). These comparisons will help us isolate the propagation effects of the fluid and the geometricaleffect of the borehole. One unique aspect to our approach will be the consideration ofradiation from boreholes surrounded by varying lithologies instead of just the Poissonsolid as is commonly done. The lithologies to be considered include a soft sediment(Pierre shale) and two more indurated sediments, Berea sandstone and Solenhofenlimestone. By following this approach we show that the effect on the radiation magnitudecan be substantial due to changes in lithology in addition to isolating the relativeeffects of the borehole and the fluid.
机译:Heelan(1952,1953a,b)的工作是从圆柱边界传播波的最早研究之一。 Heelan试图模拟从装满炸药的圆柱形发射孔发出的辐射。为此,他对嵌入无限弹性均匀介质中的空无限圆柱腔的有限长度施加恒定应力。他考虑的应力为轴向,扭转和径向应力。要求径向应力和轴向应力是成比例的,并且持续时间相同。迄今为止,Heelan的工作已被100多篇文章和15个不同的期刊所引用,其中包括近期的工作(Paulsson,1988年)。他的研究结果也与互惠定理(White,1953,1960)进行了比较,并成为重要著作的重要组成部分,其中包括Brekhovskikh(1960,1980)和White(1965,1983)的著作。他的基本贡献是描述了剪切波波瓣,这是著名的四叶玫瑰,它是从井眼中的放射源产生的,并且井眼中的轴向源和扭转源的辐射方向图具有与轴向和扭转点相同的几何形状。尽管这项工作很重要,但约旦(1962)批评该研究的结果在数学上是不合理的,而希伯(Abo-Zena)(1977)则批评了希兰的结果,而希伯(1977)则批评了希兰的结果。争论的重点是在他的第一篇论文中使用轮廓分析(Heelan,1953a)。尽管Heelan的工作没有包括充满流体的钻孔,这对我们而言是至关重要的,但他的工作仍可以被视为起点用于井下地震源的建模。例如,Lee and Balch(1982)开发了流体钻孔的辐射方向图,这是Heelan结果的简单扩展。此外,Heelan理论的一种特殊应用是对地下地震源的初步开发,这些地震源通常需要干孔直到电子设备能够正常工作为止。屏蔽。因此,对Heelan的第一篇论文中的数学和物理学进行了详尽的检查,以确定他的表述是否正确。Heelan的工作的基础是Sommerfeld积分的一种变体,它是圆柱波的积分,其中为了不指定轮廓,为克服未知轮廓的这一障碍,采用了Brekhovskikh(1960,1980)建议的平行方法。勃列霍夫斯基(Brekhovskikh)使用Weyl积分(平面波上的积分)来复制Heelan对径向应力和扭转应力的结果。但是,他没有证明所涉及的大量代数或分析的合理性,也没有包括轴向应力的影响。因此,在本文中,我们已经完成并阐明了勃列霍夫斯基(Brekhovskikh)发起的工作,并且间接证明了海兰的结果是正确的。唯一的区别是重复这项工作所需的变量分离过程的逆转,以及Abo-Zena在Laplacetransform的USe中使用的Heelan使用傅里叶变换的情况。但是,Abo-Zena的结果通过允许源函数在应用炎症的距离上变化,从而扩展了Heelan的结果。仅当对Abo-Zena的结果进行1 /μ校正时,Abo-Zena和Heelan的远场结果才是等效的(怀特,1983年)。本文的上半部分在数学上非常涉及,但是许多代数都归于附录A.验证Heelan的结果是正确的之后,我们进行了比较,将Heelan的结果与文献中已知的公认的点源表示形式(White,1983年)以及充液钻孔中点源和应力源的辐射方向图(Lee和Balch, 1982)。这些比较将有助于我们隔离流体的传播效应和井眼的几何效应。我们的方法的一个独特方面将是考虑由被不同岩性包围的钻孔的辐射,而不是通常的泊松固体。要考虑的岩性包括软质沉积物(皮埃尔页岩)和另外两种硬质沉积物,Berea砂岩和Solenhofenlimestone。通过遵循这种方法,我们表明,除了隔离井眼和流体的相对影响之外,由于岩性的变化,对辐射强度的影响可能很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号