首页> 外文OA文献 >Contactless prepaid and bankcards in transit fare collection systems
【2h】

Contactless prepaid and bankcards in transit fare collection systems

机译:运输中的非接触式预付费和银行卡收费系统

摘要

Many public transit agencies are considering direct acceptance of contactless credit and debit cards (collectively contactless bankcards) at gates in rail stations and on board buses. Concerns have been raised about riders who may not have or may not want to use contactless bankcards for transit fare payments. This thesis presents contactless prepaid cards as a potential fare payment option to meet the needs of these riders, and assesses customer attitudes toward contactless prepaid cards and bankcards. Two case studies are presented of transit agencies planning to implement contactless bankcard fare collection systems: Transport for London and the Chicago Transit Authority. A framework for evaluation of transit prepaid card options addresses two independent policy decisions: card function, or how the prepaid card may be used, and program management, the companies that partner with transit agencies to provide prepaid cards. The two card function options are: open loop cards, accepted at any merchant, or closed loop cards, used only for transit. Five possible program management options are addressed: the transit agency, bill payment companies, prepaid card companies, general payment card companies, and financial institutions. Options are analyzed along three primary dimensions: customer experience, cost, and geographic coverage of card servicing locations. The results show that closed loop and open loop cards may potentially have comparable costs for both the Chicago Transit Authority and Transport for London, although there is substantial uncertainty since no programs have yet been implemented. The cost and revenue uncertainties are higher for open loop cards than for closed loop cards. For all program management options, both transit agencies appear to face a tradeoff between costs and geographic coverage. Transit agency survey data is used to assess demand for contactless prepaid and bankcards. The results show that a small percentage of riders lacks both credit and debit cards and may have to use prepaid cards. Moreover, the majority of riders in London prefer closed loop prepaid cards, and most riders in Chicago prefer current fare media over bankcards. Discrete choice models are used to analyze factors influencing the choice between bankcards, prepaid cards, and other fare media for riders in London and Chicago. While trends among ridership groups are not strong, age and availability of payment instruments appear to influence fare media choice.
机译:许多公共交通部门正在考虑在火车站门口和公共汽车上直接接受非接触式信用卡和借记卡(统称为非接触式银行卡)。对于可能没有或不想使用非接触式银行卡支付过境车费的车手,人们提出了担忧。本文提出了非接触式预付费卡作为满足这些骑手需求的一种潜在的车费支付方式,并评估了客户对非接触式预付卡和银行卡的态度。针对计划实施非接触式银行卡票价收集系统的运输机构,提供了两个案例研究:伦敦运输公司和芝加哥运输管理局。评估公交预付卡选项的框架可解决两个独立的政策决策:卡功能或预付卡的使用方式,以及程序管理,即与公交机构合作提供预付卡的公司。这两个卡功能选项是:开环卡(可在任何商户接受)或闭环卡(仅用于运输)。解决了五个可能的程序管理选项:过境代理,账单支付公司,预付卡公司,普通支付卡公司和金融机构。根据三个主要方面对选项进行了分析:客户体验,成本和卡服务位置的地理范围。结果表明,尽管尚未实施任何计划,但存在很大的不确定性,因此对于芝加哥交通管理局和伦敦交通局而言,闭环和开环卡的成本可能相当。开环卡的成本和收入不确定性高于闭环卡。对于所有计划管理选项,两个转运机构似乎都面临成本与地理覆盖范围之间的权衡。运输机构的调查数据用于评估对非接触式预付费和银行卡的需求。结果表明,一小部分骑手既没有信用卡也没有借记卡,可能需要使用预付卡。此外,伦敦的大多数乘客更喜欢闭环预付卡,芝加哥的大多数乘客更喜欢目前的票价媒体,而不是银行卡。离散选择模型用于分析影响伦敦和芝加哥车手在银行卡,预付卡和其他票价媒体之间进行选择的因素。虽然乘车族之间的趋势并不强,但年龄和付款方式的可用性似乎会影响票价媒体的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号