首页> 外文OA文献 >Emissions trading to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States : the McCain-Lieberman Proposal
【2h】

Emissions trading to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States : the McCain-Lieberman Proposal

机译:减少美国温室气体排放的排放交易:mcCain-Lieberman提案

摘要

The Climate Stewardship Act of 2003 (S. 139) is the most detailed effort to date to design an economy-wide cap-and-trade system for US greenhouse gas emissions reductions. The Act caps sectors at their 2000 emissions in Phase I of the program, running from 2010 to 2015, and then to their 1990 emissions in Phase II starting 2016. There is a strong incentive for banking of allowances, raising the costs in Phase I to achieve savings in Phase II. Use of credits from outside the capped sectors could significantly reduce the cost of the program, even though limited to 15% and 10% of Phase I and II allowances respectively. These credits may come from CO2 sequestration in soils and forests, reductions in emissions from uncapped sectors, allowances acquired from foreign emissions trading systems, and from a special incentive program for automobile manufacturers. The 15% and 10% limits increase the incentive for banking and could prevent full use of cost-effective reductions from the uncapped sectors. Moreover, some of the potential credits might contribute little or no real climate benefit, particularly if care is not taken in defining those from forest and soil CO2 sequestration. Analysis using the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis model shows that costs over the two Phases of the program could vary substantially, depending on normal uncertainty in economic and emissions growth, and the details of credit system implementation.
机译:迄今为止,2003年的《气候管理法案》(第139条)是为设计用于减少美国温室气体排放的整个经济范围的总量管制和交易体系而做出的最详尽的努力。该法案将各行业的排放量限制在计划的第一阶段(从2010年到2015年),然后从第二阶段的2016年开始限制到1990年的排放量。强烈要求将配额存入银行,从而将第一阶段的成本提高在第二阶段实现节省。即使在第一阶段和第二阶段的配额分别限制为15%和10%,从上限行业之外使用信贷也可以显着降低该计划的成本。这些抵免额可能来自土壤和森林中的二氧化碳封存,未封盖部门的排放量减少,从外国排放权交易系统获得的配额以及针对汽车制造商的特殊奖励计划。 15%和10%的限制增加了对银行业的激励,并可能阻止没有上限的部门充分利用具有成本效益的减少措施。此外,某些潜在的信用额可能对实际的气候效益几乎没有贡献,甚至没有贡献,特别是如果不谨慎定义来自森林和土壤二氧化碳封存的信用额。使用MIT排放预测和政策分析模型进行的分析表明,该计划的两个阶段的成本可能会有很大不同,具体取决于经济和排放增长的正常不确定性以及信贷体系实施的细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号