首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation and synthesis of methods for measuring system engineering efficacy with a project and organization
【2h】

Evaluation and synthesis of methods for measuring system engineering efficacy with a project and organization

机译:用项目和组织评估和综合测量系统工程效率的方法

摘要

The need for robust systems engineering in product development has been understood by those developing product in the aerospace and defense industries since the days of the Atlas ballistic missile program. In recent times industries developing systems of similar complexity have come to respect the value of systems engineering. Systems engineering is the glue which binds a large technical team and focuses the engineering effort towards satisfying a set of realizable customer needs. EIA/IS-632 definition of systems engineering is as follows; "Systems engineering is an interdisciplinary approach encompassing the entire technical effort to evolve and verify an integrated and life-cycle balanced set of system people, product and process solutions that satisfy customer needs."To control and improve a process a viable set of measures must be in place. Existing measures of the strength of the systems engineering process in a specific project address only project execution (e.g. earned value) and technical performance. When applied properly these metrics provide valuable insight into the status (cost and schedule) of a project and a products ability to meet customer needs. However, few of these existing measures are progressive in nature and as such fail to provide early warnings of systems engineering process failure. What are needed are prognostics for the systems engineering effort; gauges to provide predictions of future events which impact product cost, schedule and/or performance. The Lean Aerospace Initiative (LAI), working with the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), released a guide (in Beta form) in December of 2005 outlining a progressive set of thirteen leading indicators to address this need. This set of metrics has yet to be been verified against an active or historical project but provides a starting ground for additional research.
机译:自Atlas弹道导弹计划问世以来,航空航天和国防工业中的产品开发人员就已经意识到在产品开发中对强大的系统工程的需求。近年来,开发具有类似复杂性的系统的行业已经开始尊重系统工程的价值。系统工程是粘合大型技术团队并致力于满足一系列可实现的客户需求的工程胶。 EIA / IS-632系统工程的定义如下: “系统工程是一种跨学科方法,涵盖了开发和验证满足客户需求的系统人员,产品和过程解决方案的集成且生命周期平衡的整套技术工作的全部技术工作。”要控制和改进过程,必须采取一套可行的措施就位。现有针对特定项目中系统工程过程强度的衡量标准仅涉及项目执行(例如,获利价值)和技术性能。如果正确应用这些指标,则可以深入了解项目的状态(成本和进度)以及满足客户需求的产品能力。但是,这些现有措施中很少有本质上是渐进式的,因此无法提供有关系统工程过程故障的预警。需要系统工程工作的预测。量规以提供对影响产品成本,进度和/或性能的未来事件的预测。精益航空航天计划(LAI)与国际系统工程理事会(INCOSE)合作,于2005年12月发布了一份指南(以Beta形式),概述了为满足这一需求而制定的一系列13项领先指标。这套指标尚未针对一个活跃或历史项目进行验证,但为进一步的研究提供了起点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Flynn Timothy Daniel;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号