首页> 外文OA文献 >The Promise and Perils of Private Voluntary Regulation: Labor Standards and Work Organization in Two Mexican Garment Factories
【2h】

The Promise and Perils of Private Voluntary Regulation: Labor Standards and Work Organization in Two Mexican Garment Factories

机译:私人自愿性监管的承诺和危险:两个墨西哥服装工厂的劳工标准和工作组织

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

What role can private voluntary regulation play in improving labor standards and working conditions in global supply chain factories? How does this system relate to and interact with other systems of labor regulation and work organization? This paper seeks to address these questions through a structured comparison of two factories supplying Nike, the world’s largest athletic footwear and apparel company. These two factories have many similarities - both are in Mexico, both are in the apparel industry, both produce more or less the same products for Nike (and other brands) and both are subject to the same code of conduct. On the surface, both factories appear to have similar employment (i.e., recruitment, training, remuneration) practices and they receive comparable scores when audited by Nike’s compliance staff. However, underlying (and somewhat obscured by) these apparent similarities, significant differences in actual labor conditions exist between these two factories. What drives these differences in working conditions? What does this imply for traditional systems of monitoring and codes of conduct? Field research conducted at these two factories reveals that beneath the code of conduct and various monitoring efforts aimed at enforcing it, workplace conditions and labor standards are shaped by very different patterns of work organization and human resource management policies.
机译:私人自愿监管在改善全球供应链工厂的劳工标准和工作条件方面可以发挥什么作用?该系统如何与其他劳动法规和工作组织系统相关联并相互作用?本文旨在通过结构性比较两家供应耐克的工厂来解决这些问题,耐克是世界上最大的运动鞋和服装公司。这两个工厂有很多相似之处-都在墨西哥,都在服装行业,都为耐克(和其他品牌)生产或多或少相同的产品,并且都遵循相同的行为准则。从表面上看,两家工厂的雇佣(即招募,培训,薪酬)做法相似,并且在经过耐克合规人员的审核后,它们的得分相当。但是,由于这些明显的相似之处(在某种程度上被其遮盖了),这两家工厂之间在实际劳动条件上存在着很大的差异。是什么导致这些工作条件差异?这对于传统的监控和行为准则系统意味着什么?在这两家工厂进行的实地研究表明,在行为守则和旨在执行该守则的各种监督工作之下,工作条件和劳工标准是由工作组织和人力资源管理政策的不同模式所塑造的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号