首页> 外文OA文献 >On the Hooked Rates of the Tuna and Shark in Tuna Long Line Fishing with Underwater Lamps, with Luminous Baits and with Ordinary Hooks
【2h】

On the Hooked Rates of the Tuna and Shark in Tuna Long Line Fishing with Underwater Lamps, with Luminous Baits and with Ordinary Hooks

机译:利用水下灯具,发光诱饵和普通挂钩进行金枪鱼长线捕捞金枪鱼和鲨鱼的钩率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

1. To study the baiting conditions of the tuna and shark based on their phototaxis, the authors performed a test fishing in the Indian Ocean on board "Nagasaki-maru" of Nagasaki University for 7 days from 3 to 9 August 1966, using the tuna long line with underwater lamps and with luminous baits. 2. The fishing, methods with underwater lamps and with luminous baits were compared with the fishing method with ordinary hooks only, and the significance in the difference between them was studied. 3. For the hooked rates, the method with underwater lamps gave 3.91%, the method with luminous baits 3.18%, and the method with ordinary hooks 1.70%. 4. The means for the three methods were compared with eachother, but it cannot be mentioned that the means of their respective population are necessarily different from each other. Accordingly, it is impossible to judge which method is the most effective without further accumulation of experiment.
机译:1.为了研究金枪鱼和鲨鱼基于趋光性的诱饵条件,作者于1966年8月3日至9日在长崎大学“长崎丸”号上的印度洋上进行了7天的垂钓,与水下灯和发光饵的长队。 2.将钓鱼,水下灯和夜光诱饵的方法与仅使用普通钩的钓鱼方法进行了比较,并研究了两者之间的区别。 3.对于钩形率,水下灯方法为3.91%,夜光诱饵方法为3.18%,普通钩形方法为1.70%。 4.三种方法的均值相互比较,但不能提及它们各自总体的均值必定彼此不同。因此,没有进一步的实验积累就无法判断哪种方法最有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号