首页> 外文OA文献 >Should Foresighters Embrace Team Syntegrity? udA case study in retail
【2h】

Should Foresighters Embrace Team Syntegrity? udA case study in retail

机译:先知者应该拥抱Team syntegrity吗? UD零售业案例研究

摘要

This study explores the relative value of Stafford Beer’s Team Syntegrity approach in determining the possible futures for the retail industry. The foresighter’s toolkit expands as multiple disciplines contribute to an evolving set of methodologies and practices. To date, scenario planning is most commonly associated with a standard matrix, based on two critical uncertainties, that is also used to evaluate strategic directions for organizations. This process, however, is sometimes criticized for its lack of complexity and integration of stakeholder knowledge. Fast moving or distressed economic sectors, such as retail, may learn more from foresight processes that are more participatory and agile, while maintaining complexity. Team Syntegrity, largely a strategic planning tool, may prove to be a beneficial alternative, as it integrates scenario and strategic planning purposes in its very design. This study compares Team Syntegrity and scenario building (the 2x2 matrix), sheds light on the turbulence within retail today, and explores possibilities for greater resilience tomorrow.
机译:这项研究探讨了斯塔福德·比尔(Stordford Beer)的“团队协同”方法在确定零售业可能的未来方面的相对价值。随着多种学科对不断发展的方法论和实践的贡献,预见者的工具包也在不断扩展。迄今为止,基于两个关键的不确定性,方案规划最常与标准矩阵关联,该矩阵还用于评估组织的战略方向。但是,有时会批评该过程缺乏复杂性和利益相关者知识的整合。快速发展或陷入困境的经济部门,例如零售业,可以在保持复杂性的同时,从更具参与性和敏捷性的预见过程中学到更多东西。 Team Syntegrity主要是一种战略计划工具,可能被证明是一种有益的选择,因为它在其设计中集成了方案和战略计划目的。这项研究比较了团队合作精神和情景构建(2x2矩阵),揭示了当今零售业的动荡,并探讨了明天增强弹性的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    ONeil Tara;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号