首页> 外文OA文献 >KPIs for measuring the sustainability performance of ecodesign implementation into product development and related processes: a systematic literature review
【2h】

KPIs for measuring the sustainability performance of ecodesign implementation into product development and related processes: a systematic literature review

机译:用于衡量生态设计实施在产品开发和相关过程中的可持续性绩效的关键绩效指标:系统的文献综述

摘要

The development of products with improved environmental performance is increasingly part of companies’ engagement towards sustainable development. Ecodesign is an approach for integrating environmental aspects into the product development and related processes (PDRP), such as manufacturing, marketing, procurement etc. in order to develop products with increased environmental performance.The application of ecodesign potentially presents a set of sustainability benefits, such as innovation potential, development of new products and business models, the ability to meet or exceed customer expectation regarding the product/service, reduction in environmental liability and improvement of organizational brand, promotion of health and safety aspects along the life cycle, among others. However, despite the potential benefits and the existence of systematized frameworks for ecodesign implementation, many difficulties still surround the implementation and management of ecodesign. The main challenges in embedding ecodesign into PDRP are: (i) the lack of support to select key performance indicators (KPI) to measure how well a company is being successful in ecodesign integration from a product development process perspective; and (ii) to quantify the sustainability benefits of ecodesign implementation. Various frameworks for performance measurement systems (PMS) have been proposed, such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Neely’s “Performance Prism”. The PMS bundles the set of individual indicators with the company’s internal and external environment. However, these framework-basedapproaches do not incorporate the sustainability dimensions. Furthermore, their use in product development activities have been criticised in the literature due to the fact that the traditional accounting measure are not suitable for strategic-level decision. Besides, the traditional metrics are also pointed out to be historical and hard to correlate, providing little information on the root cause of problems. The literature also highlight the fact that research and development performance is not focused on the performance result’s impact on the overall corporate behaviour.This research aims at presenting a comprehensive set of sustainability KPI to measure the ecodesign implementation into the PDRP by systematically reviewing the relevant literature regarding sustainability KPIs (social, economic and environmental dimensions). The underlying research question is “which arethe KPIs for measuring sustainability of ecodesign integration into the product development and related processes?” This research excludes the indicators dealing directly and exclusively with product’s attributes and properties, such as energy and material consumption, once the main focus is positioned at the development process itself. The main results of this research include: (i) a comprehensive database of sustainability KPIs for PDRP;and (ii) a common ground for communicating and reporting improvements in ecodesign implementations. These results are expected to lead the pathway for building a sustainability-focused performance measurement system and ground an accurate assessment of sustainability integration into the PDRP. Furthermore, with a more appropriate sustainability-based performance measurement system in place, companies will be able to perform benchmarking, including intra-sector and cross-sector settings. Initial discussions on how to incorporate these KPI in an effective decision-making approach for implementing ecodesign into manufacturing companies is carried out in this paper. These perspectives lead to some suggestions of future work, which are based on deriving relationships between PDRP sustainability indicators and ecodesign management practices as a stepping-stone for building relevant assessment tools in the field of sustainability performance of ecodesign implementation.
机译:开发具有更高环境绩效的产品越来越成为公司致力于可持续发展的一部分。生态设计是一种将环境因素整合到产品开发和相关过程(PDRP)中的方法,例如制造,营销,采购等,以开发具有更高环境绩效的产品。生态设计的应用可能会带来一系列的可持续性收益,例如创新潜力,新产品和商业模式的开发,满足或超出客户对产品/服务的期望,减少环境责任和改善组织品牌,在生命周期内促进健康和安全等方面的能力。然而,尽管潜在的好处和生态设计实施的系统化框架的存在,但生态设计的实施和管理仍然存在许多困难。将生态设计嵌入PDRP的主要挑战是:(i)缺乏选择关键绩效指标(KPI)的支持,以从产品开发过程的角度衡量公司在生态设计集成方面的成功程度; (ii)量化实施生态设计的可持续性收益。已经提出了各种绩效评估系统(PMS)框架,例如Balanced Scorecard(BSC)和Neely的“ Performance Prism”。 PMS将一组单独的指标与公司的内部和外部环境捆绑在一起。但是,这些基于框架的方法未包含可持续性方面。此外,由于传统会计方法不适用于战略决策,这一事实在文献中受到批评。此外,传统指标也被指出是历史性的并且难以关联,几乎没有提供有关问题根本原因的信息。文献还强调了这样一个事实,即研发绩效并未集中于绩效结果对整体公司行为的影响,该研究旨在通过系统地回顾相关文献,提出一套全面的可持续性KPI来衡量PDRP中的生态设计实施关于可持续性KPI(社会,经济和环境方面)。潜在的研究问题是“哪些指标用于衡量将生态设计集成到产品开发和相关流程中的可持续性?”一旦主要重点放在开发过程本身上,这项研究就排除了直接和专门涉及产品属性和特性(例如能源和材料消耗)的指标。这项研究的主要结果包括:(i)PDRP可持续性KPI的全面数据库;以及(ii)交流和报告生态设计实施改进的共同基础。预期这些结果将引导建立以可持续性为重点的绩效评估系统,并为将可持续性整合到PDRP中进行准确评估。此外,有了更合适的基于可持续性的绩效评估系统,公司将能够进行基准测试,包括部门内部和跨部门设置。本文就如何将这些KPI纳入有效的决策方法以对制造公司实施生态设计进行了初步讨论。这些观点提出了一些未来工作的建议,这些建议基于PDRP可持续性指标与生态设计管理实践之间的关系,是建立生态设计实施的可持续性绩效领域相关评估工具的垫脚石。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号