首页> 外文OA文献 >Adaptation requirements due to anatomical changes in free-breathing and deep-inspiration breath-hold for standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy of lung cancer patients
【2h】

Adaptation requirements due to anatomical changes in free-breathing and deep-inspiration breath-hold for standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy of lung cancer patients

机译:适用于肺癌患者标准和剂量递增放疗的自由呼吸和深吸气屏息解剖变化的适应要求

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Radiotherapy of lung cancer patients is subject to uncertainties related to heterogeneities, anatomical changes and breathing motion. Use of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) can reduce the treated volume, potentially enabling dose-escalated (DE) treatments. This study was designed to investigate the need for adaptation due to anatomical changes, for both standard (ST) and DE plans in free-breathing (FB) and DIBH. Material and methods. The effect of tumor shrinkage (TS), pleural effusion (PE) and atelectasis was investigated for patients and for a CIRS thorax phantom. Sixteen patients were computed tomography (CT) imaged both in FB and DIBH. Anatomical changes were simulated by CT information editing and re-calculations, of both ST and DE plans, in the treatment planning system. PE was systematically simulated by adding fl uid in the dorsal region of the lung and TS by reduction of the tumor volume. Results. Phantom simulations resulted in maximum deviations in mean dose to the GTV-T ( D ) of -1% for 3 cm PE and centrally located tumor, and + 3% for TS from 5 cm to 1 cm diameter for an anterior tumor location. For the majority of the patients, simulated PE resulted in a decreasing D with increasing amount of fluid and increasing D for decreasing tumor volume. Maximum change in D of -3% (3 cm PE in FB for both ST and DE plans) and + 10% (2 cm TS in FB for DE plan) was observed. Large atelectasis reduction increased the D with 2% for FB and had no effect for DIBH. Conclusion. Phantom simulations provided potential adaptation action levels for PE and TS. For the more complex patient geometry, individual assessment of the dosimetric impact is recommended for both ST and DE plans in DIBH as well as in FB. However, DIBH was found to be superior over FB for DE plans, regarding robustness of D to TS.
机译:背景。肺癌患者的放射治疗存在与异质性,解剖学变化和呼吸运动有关的不确定性。使用深呼吸屏气(DIBH)可以减少治疗量,从而有可能实现剂量递增(DE)治疗。这项研究的目的是研究自由呼吸(FB)和DIBH的标准(ST)和DE计划由于解剖学变化而引起的适应性需求。材料与方法。研究了患者和CIRS胸模的肿瘤缩小(TS),胸腔积液(PE)和肺不张的影响。 16例患者在FB和DIBH中均进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)。在治疗计划系统中,通过ST和DE计划的CT信息编辑和重新计算来模拟解剖变化。通过在肺背侧添加液体和通过减少肿瘤体积的TS来系统地模拟PE。结果。幻影模拟对3 cm PE和位于中心的肿瘤导致GTV-T()平均剂量的最大偏差为-1%,对于前部肿瘤位置,直径从5 cm到1 cm的TS为+ 3% 。对于大多数患者,模拟PE导致随着体液量的增加而减少,而因肿瘤体积减小而增加。观察到D的最大变化为-3%(对于ST和DE计划,FB中为3 cm PE)和+ 10%(对于DE计划,FB中为2 cm TS)。大的肺不张减少使FB的增加2%,而对DIBH没有影响。结论。幻影模拟为PE和TS提供了潜在的适应动作水平。对于更复杂的患者几何形状,建议对DIBH和FB中的ST和DE计划分别进行剂量学影响的评估。但是,对于对TS的鲁棒性,对于DE计划,发现DIBH优于FB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号