首页> 外文OA文献 >The Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III and the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-Short Form: a confirmatory factor analysis
【2h】

The Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III and the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-Short Form: a confirmatory factor analysis

机译:疼痛恐惧问卷-III和痛苦问卷调查表 - 简短形式:验证性因素分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III (FPQ-III) is a widely used instrument to assess the fear of pain (FOP) in clinical and nonclinical samples. The FPQ-III has 30 items and is divided into three subscales: Severe Pain, Minor Pain and Medical Pain. Due to findings of poor fit of the original three-factor FPQ-III model, the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (FPQ-SF) four-factor model has been suggested as an alternative. The FPQ-SF is a revised version of the FPQ-III, reduced to 20 items and subdivided into four subscales: Severe Pain, Minor Pain, Injection Pain and Dental Pain.Aims and methods: The purpose of the study was to investigate the model fit, reliability and validity of the FPQ-III and the FPQ-SF in a Norwegian nonclinical sample, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The second aim was to explore the model fit of the two scales in male and female subgroups separately, since previous studies have uncovered differences in how well the questionnaires measure FOP across sex; thus, the questionnaires might not be sex neutral. It has been argued that the FPQ-SF model is better because of the higher fit to the data across sex. To explore model fit across sex within the questionnaires, the model fit, validity and reliability were compared across sex using CFA.Results: The results revealed that both models' original factor structures had poor fit. However, the FPQ-SF had a better fit overall, compared to the FPQ-III. The model fit of the two models differed across sex, with better fit for males on the FPQ-III and for females on the FPQ-SF.Conclusion: The FPQ-SF is a better questionnaire than the FPQ-III for measurement of FOP in Norwegian samples and across sex subgroups. However, the FPQ-III is a better questionnaire for males than for females, whereas the FPQ-SF is a better questionnaire for females than for males. The findings are discussed and directions for future investigations outlined.
机译:背景:《恐惧恐惧调查表-III》(FPQ-III)是一种广泛用于评估临床和非临床样本对疼痛的恐惧感(FOP)的工具。 FPQ-III有30个项目,分为三个分量表:严重疼痛,轻微疼痛和医疗疼痛。由于发现原始三因素FPQ-III模型的拟合度较差,建议使用“恐惧疼痛问卷-简短表格”(FPQ-SF)四因素模型作为替代方案。 FPQ-SF是FPQ-III的修订版,减少到20个项目,分为四个分量表:重度疼痛,次要疼痛,注射性疼痛和牙科疼痛。目的和方法:本研究的目的是研究模型使用验证性因子分析(CFA),挪威非临床样本中FPQ-III和FPQ-SF的拟合度,信度和效度。第二个目的是分别探讨男性和女性亚组中两个量表的模型拟合,因为先前的研究发现调查表在跨性别中对FOP的测量水平上存在差异。因此,问卷可能不是性别中立的。有人认为,FPQ-SF模型更好,因为它更适合跨性别的数据。为了在问卷中探讨跨性别的模型拟合度,使用CFA对跨性别的模型拟合度,有效性和可靠性进行了比较。结果:结果表明,两个模型的原始因子结构均较差。但是,与FPQ-III相比,FPQ-SF总体上具有更好的适应性。两种模型的模型拟合因性别而异,在FPQ-III上男性更适合在FPQ-SF上女性。结论:FPQ-SF比FPQ-III更好的问卷用于测量FOP挪威样本和跨性别的亚组。但是,FPQ-III的男性问卷调查表优于女性,而FPQ-SF的女性问卷调查表优于男性。讨论了调查结果,并概述了未来调查的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号