首页> 外文OA文献 >Framework for Multi-Pathway Cumulative Exposure for Comparative Assessments
【2h】

Framework for Multi-Pathway Cumulative Exposure for Comparative Assessments

机译:比较评估的多途径累积暴露框架

摘要

Efforts to assess human and ecosystem exposure to contaminants released to multiple environmental media have been evolving over the last decades. In this talk, we summarize the development and evolution of the multimedia mass-balance approach combined with multi-pathway exposure assessment as a framework for comparative assessment of chemicals, products, and services. We first review the development and evolution of the multimedia mass-balance approach to pollutant fate and exposure evaluation and illustrate some of the calculations used in multimedia, multi-pathway exposure assessments. The multimedia approach requires comprehensive assessments that locate all points of chemical release to the environment, characterize mass-balance relationships, and track contaminants through the entire environmental system to exposure of individuals or populations or specific ecosystems. For use in comparative risk assessment, life-cycle assessment (LCA), and chemical alternatives assessment (CAA), multimedia fate and exposure models synthesize information about partitioning, reaction, and intermedia-transport properties of chemicals in a representative (local to regional) or generic (continental to global) environment with information about larger scale populations rather than specific individuals or vulnerable subgroups. Although there can be large uncertainties in this approach, it provides insight on how chemical properties and use patterns map onto population-scale metrics of exposure, such as intake fraction for characterizing human intake per unit emission and aquatic or terrestrial ecosystem exposure concentrations per unit emission. We next discuss the reliability with which fate models at different levels of geographic scale--from near field indoor scales to urban, regional, continental and even global scale--can be used to determine cumulative human exposure and/or ecosystem exposure from multiple pollutants and emissions sources. The key question here is whether the results of cumulative assessments can provide sufficient insight for decision makers who are concerned with life-cycle impacts and chemical alternatives. We present a regional case study for pesticide alternatives in an agricultural valley of California to assess the opportunities and future prospects for the multi-pathway cumulative framework in LCA and CAA. This case reveals that the relative contributions to cumulative pollutant intake via different exposure pathways depend on (a) persistence of chemicals at different levels of integration (regional, urban-scale, food-web, indoors), (b) basic chemical properties, (c) the retention of chemicals in food webs, and (d) the retention of chemicals by indoor surfaces.
机译:在过去的几十年中,人们一直在努力评估人类和生态系统暴露于多种环境介质中的污染物的暴露程度。在本演讲中,我们总结了多媒体质量平衡方法与多途径接触评估相结合的发展和演变,该评估方法是对化学品,产品和服务进行比较评估的框架。我们首先回顾用于污染物归宿和暴露评估的多媒体质量平衡方法的发展和演变,并说明在多媒体,多途径暴露评估中使用的一些计算方法。多媒体方法需要进行全面评估,以定位化学物质向环境释放的所有点,表征质量平衡关系,并在整个环境系统中跟踪污染物暴露于个人或种群或特定生态系统的情况。为了在比较风险评估,生命周期评估(LCA)和化学替代品评估(CAA)中使用,多媒体结局和暴露模型综合了代表(本地到区域)中化学品的分配,反应和中间运输性质的信息或一般(大陆到全球)环境,其中包含有关大规模人群的信息,而不是特定个人或弱势群体的信息。尽管此方法可能存在很大的不确定性,但是它提供了关于化学性质和使用模式如何映射到人口规模暴露指标的见解,例如用于表征人类单位排放量的摄入量百分比和单位排放量对水生或陆地生态系统的暴露浓度。接下来,我们将讨论不同地理范围(从近场室内尺度到城市,区域,大陆乃至全球尺度)的命运模型可用于确定人类对多种污染物的累积暴露和/或生态系统暴露的可靠性。和排放源。这里的关键问题是累积评估的结果是否可以为关注生命周期影响和化学替代品的决策者提供足够的见解。我们提出了一个加利福尼亚农业谷地农药替代品的区域案例研究,以评估LCA和CAA中多途径累积框架的机会和未来前景。该案例表明,通过不同的暴露途径对累积污染物摄入的相对贡献取决于(a)不同整合水平(区域,城市规模,食物网,室内)的化学物质持久性,(b)基本化学性质,( c)保留食物网中的化学物质,以及(d)室内表面保留的化学物质。

著录项

  • 作者

    McKone Tom; Fantke Peter;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号