首页> 外文OA文献 >Using a Bayesian Probabilistic Forecasting Model to Analyze the Uncertainty in Real-Time Dynamic Control of the Flood Limiting Water Level for Reservoir Operation
【2h】

Using a Bayesian Probabilistic Forecasting Model to Analyze the Uncertainty in Real-Time Dynamic Control of the Flood Limiting Water Level for Reservoir Operation

机译:利用贝叶斯概率预测模型分析水库运行洪水限制水位实时动态控制的不确定性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dynamic control of the flood limiting water level (FLWL) is a valuable and effective way to maximize the benefits from reservoir operation without exceeding the design risk. In order to analyze the impacts of input uncertainty, a Bayesian forecasting system (BFS) is adopted. Applying quantile water inflow values and their uncertainties obtained from the BFS, the reservoir operation results from different schemes can be analyzed in terms of benefits, dam safety, and downstream impacts during the flood season. When the reservoir FLWL dynamic control operation is implemented, there are two fundamental kinds of dynamic control bounds. One is the flood subseasonal FLWL dynamic control bounds, which are based on the segmentation of the flood season and the ranges of the FLWL in every flood subseason (Scheme I); the other one is the flood seasonal FLWL dynamic control bound, which takes the flood season as a whole, thus producing only one boundary [Scheme II]. The Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) in China was selected as a case study in this paper. The application results show that the thresholds of maximum outflow, which impact the downstream and maximum reservoir levels, are not exceeded during the flood season under the analyzed FLWL control schemes. The benefits in terms of the floodwater utilization rate, hydropower generation, and water level at the end of the flood season from two dynamic controls of the FLWL scheme are better than the current design, which applies a static FLWL. For comparison, also deterministic water inflow was tested. The proposed model in the paper emphasizes the importance of analyzing the uncertainties of the water inflow forecasting system for real-time dynamic control of the FLWL for reservoir operation. For the case study, the selected quantile inflow from the Bayesian forecasting system and the matching operation are beneficial for the decision makers of the Three Gorges Reservoir.
机译:动态控制洪水极限水位(FLWL)是在不超出设计风险的情况下最大化水库运营收益的有效途径。为了分析输入不确定性的影响,采用了贝叶斯预测系统(BFS)。应用从BFS获得的分位数水流入值及其不确定性,可以根据收益,大坝安全性和洪水季节的下游影响来分析不同方案的水库运行结果。当执行储层FLWL动态控制操作时,存在两种基本类型的动态控制范围。一个是洪水亚季节的FLWL动态控制范围,其基于洪水季节的分段和每个洪水亚季节中FLWL的范围(方案I);另一个是洪水季节FLWL动态控制界限,它将洪水季节作为一个整体,因此仅产生一个边界[方案II]。本文以中国三峡水库(TGR)为案例研究。应用结果表明,在分析的FLWL控制方案下,在洪水季节不会超过影响下游和最大水库水位的最大流出阈值。 FLWL方案的两个动态控制在洪水季节结束时的洪水利用率,水力发电和水位方面的收益要优于采用静态FLWL的当前设计。为了进行比较,还测试了确定性的水流入量。本文提出的模型强调了分析水流预测系统的不确定性对于水库运行FLWL实时动态控制的重要性。对于案例研究,从贝叶斯预测系统中选择的分位数流入量和匹配操作对三峡水库的决策者是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号