首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing superconducting and permanent magnets for magnetic refrigeration
【2h】

Comparing superconducting and permanent magnets for magnetic refrigeration

机译:比较用于磁制冷的超导磁体和永磁体

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compare the cost of a high temperature superconducting (SC) tape-based solenoidwith a permanent magnet (PM) Halbach cylinder for magnetic refrigeration.Assuming a five liter active magnetic regenerator volume, the price of each type ofmagnet is determined as a function of aspect ratio of the regenerator and desiredinternal magnetic field. It is shown that to produce a 1 T internal field in theregenerator a permanent magnet of hundreds of kilograms is needed or an area ofsuperconducting tape of tens of square meters. The cost of cooling the SC solenoidis shown to be a small fraction of the cost of the SC tape. Assuming a cost ofthe SC tape of 6000 $/m and a price of the permanent magnet of 100 $/kg, thesuperconducting solenoid is shown to be a factor of 0.3-3 times more expensive thanthe permanent magnet, for a desired field from 0.5-1.75 T and the geometrical aspectratio of the regenerator. This factor decreases for increasing field strength, indicatingthat the superconducting solenoid could be suitable for high field, large coolingpower applications.
机译:我们比较了高温超导(SC)带式螺线管和永磁(PM)哈尔巴赫圆筒用于磁制冷的成本。假设有5升有源磁蓄冷器,则每种磁体的价格取决于外观再生器与所需内部磁场之比。结果表明,要在蓄热器中产生1 T的内部磁场,需要数百公斤的永磁体或数十平方米的超导带面积。冷却SC螺线管的成本仅占SC磁带成本的一小部分。假设SC胶带的成本为6000美元/米,永磁体的价格为100美元/ kg,则对于0.5-0.0的理想磁场,超导螺线管的成本是永磁体的0.3-3倍。 1.75 T和蓄热室的几何长径比。随着磁场强度的增加,该系数减小,这表明超导螺线管可能适用于高磁场,大冷却功率的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号