首页> 外文OA文献 >Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: the mediating role of psychological ownership
【2h】

Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: the mediating role of psychological ownership

机译:知识共享和情感承诺:心理所有权的中介作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

– The purpose of this paper is to investigate the meditating role of psychological ownership which includes both organisation-based psychological ownership (OPO) and knowledge-based psychological ownership (KPO) on the relationship between affective commitment and knowledge sharing. – This paper is an empirical study based on structural equation modelling, with a sample of 293 employees from 31 high-technology firms in China. – The result indicated that affective commitment had a significant positive effect on OPO but no effect on KPO; OPO was positively related to both common and key knowledge sharing, while KPO exerted a negative impact on both; common knowledge sharing was positively related to key knowledge sharing; the relationship between affective commitment and key knowledge sharing was multi-mediated by OPO and common knowledge sharing. – OPO and KPO play an essential role in transferring the effect of employees’ affective commitment to common knowledge sharing and key knowledge sharing, which unravels the blackbox of how effective commitment affects knowledge sharing.
机译:–本文的目的是研究心理所有权的冥想作用,包括基于组织的心理所有权(OPO)和基于知识的心理所有权(KPO)对情感承诺和知识共享之间的关系的影响。 –本文是基于结构方程模型的实证研究,样本来​​自中国31家高科技公司的293名员工。 –结果表明,情感承诺对OPO有显着的积极影响,但对KPO没有影响; OPO与共有知识和关键知识共享都具有正相关关系,而KPO对两者都有负面影响;共同知识共享与关键知识共享正相关;情感承诺与关键知识共享之间的关系是由OPO和常识共享之间的多重中介。 – OPO和KPO在将员工的情感承诺的影响转移到公共知识共享和关键知识共享中起着至关重要的作用,从而揭开了有效承诺如何影响知识共享的黑匣子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号