首页> 外文OA文献 >How to implement the circular economy in the beer packaging sector through eco-efficiency- and eco-effectiveness- based solutions
【2h】

How to implement the circular economy in the beer packaging sector through eco-efficiency- and eco-effectiveness- based solutions

机译:如何通过基于生态效率和生态效益的解决方案实现啤酒包装行业的循环经济

摘要

According to Verghese et al (2012) sustainable packaging should be: effective in delivering its functional requirements, efficient in its use of materials, energy, and water throughout its life cycle, cyclic in its use of renewable materials and recoverability at end-of-life, and safe for people and the natural environment. Companies in the packaging sector have traditionally been using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to fulfill these requirements. However, being inspired by the eco-efficiency principle, LCA aims to reduce the negative environmental footprint of human activities by optimizing product system individually, without considering multiple future uses of resources in continuous loops (Bjørn and Hauschild, 2013). A broader approach oriented towards product quality and innovation is the Cradle to Cradle® (C2C) design framework. C2C aims to increase the positive footprint of products by designing “eco-effective” solutions, i. e. maximizing the benefit to ecological systems. C2C is based on three key principles “waste equal food”, “use solar energy income” and “celebrate diversity” (McDonough and Braungart, 2002). The first principle calls for eliminating the concept of waste and challenges production systems to use materials in continuous loops through the “up-cycling” approach, which consists in improving the quality of materials or systems for recycling materials. From a company point of view, LCA and C2C are complementary approaches to implement the circular economy and develop sustainable and innovative solutions for packaging. We will illustrate the challenges and opportunities emerging from the case study of Carlsberg Circular Community, a cooperation platform where Carlsberg and some global partners are joining forces to reduce the reliance on raw materials, and support the circular economy by improving quality and purity of packaging. We will consider the case of aluminium cans and discuss how both approaches can be combined within the circular economy framework. From an LCA perspective, the Life Cycle Inventory of aluminium products is currently based on a pure aluminium flow, neglecting the presence of alloying elements. However an aluminium can is composed of two main components, the body and the lid, which are made of two different wrought alloys. This aspect needs to be taken into account while addressing the use of aluminium in continuous loops, even in a closed product loop recycling. Therefore, we will discuss how upcycling can be defined for aluminium cans, including both eco-efficiency- and eco-effectiveness- inspired considerations, i. e. both from a C2C and LCA point of view.
机译:根据Verghese等人(2012)的研究,可持续包装应:有效地履行其功能要求,在其整个生命周期中有效地使用材料,能源和水,在使用可再生材料时具有周期性,并在回收期结束时可回收生命,对人类和自然环境安全。传统上,包装行业的公司一直在使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法来满足这些要求。然而,受生态效率原则的启发,LCA旨在通过单独优化产品系统来减少人类活动的负面环境足迹,而不考虑连续循环中资源的多种未来使用(Bjørn和Hauschild,2013年)。 Cradle toCradle®(C2C)设计框架是面向产品质量和创新的更广泛方法。 C2C旨在通过设计“生态有效”的解决方案来增加产品的正面足迹,即e。使生态系统的利益最大化。 C2C基于三个基本原则:“浪费同等的食物”,“利用太阳能的收入”和“庆祝多样性”(McDonough和Braungart,2002年)。第一条原则要求消除浪费的概念,并要求生产系统通过“向上循环”方法在连续循环中使用物料,这包括提高物料质量或物料循环系统。从公司的角度来看,LCA和C2C是实施循环经济和开发可持续和创新包装解决方案的补充方法。我们将举例说明嘉士伯循环社区的案例研究中出现的挑战和机遇,该合作平台是嘉士伯与一些全球合作伙伴携手合作,以减少对原材料的依赖,并通过提高包装的质量和纯度来支持循环经济。我们将考虑铝罐的情况,并讨论如何在循环经济框架内将这两种方法结合起来。从LCA角度来看,铝产品的生命周期清单目前基于纯铝流,而忽略了合金元素的存在。但是,铝罐由两个主要部件组成:主体和盖子,它们由两种不同的锻造合金制成。解决铝在连续循环中使用时,甚至在封闭的产品循环回收中,都需要考虑到这一方面。因此,我们将讨论如何定义铝罐的升级换代,包括从生态效率和生态效益方面考虑的因素,即e。从C2C和LCA的角度来看。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号