首页> 外文OA文献 >Cost benchmarking of railway projects in Europe – can it help to reduce costs?
【2h】

Cost benchmarking of railway projects in Europe – can it help to reduce costs?

机译:欧洲铁路项目的成本基准 - 有助于降低成本吗?

摘要

This paper highlights the methodology of construction cost benchmarking of railway projects in the EU and its preliminary results. Benchmarking helps project managers learn from others, improve particular project areas, and reduce project costs. For railway projects, benchmarking is essential for the comparison of unit costs for major cost drivers (e.g. tunnels, bridges, etc.).This methodology was applied to the case study described in this paper, the first high-speed railway project in Denmark, “The New Line Copenhagen-Ringsted”. The aim was to avoid cost overruns and even reduce final budget outcomes by looking for the best practices in the construction and implementation of other high-speed lines in Europe and learning from their experience.The paper presents benchmarking from nine railway projects that are comparable with the Copenhagen-Ringsted project. The results of this comparison provide a certain overview of the range of costs in various budget disciplines. The Copenhagen-Ringsted project is shown to be right in the middle of the range in terms of total costs per kilometre, and its values in the discipline comparisons do not significantly differ from the values of the less expensive projects. Deeper analysis of project unit costs is still continuing, but the preliminary results show that the cost values for projects located in the same geographical zone are similar. For example, this can be explained by their use of the same construction companies. However, unit prices in southern Europe are lower than in northern Europe.
机译:本文重点介绍了欧盟铁路项目建设成本基准的方法及其初步结果。标杆管理可以帮助项目经理从他人那里学习,改善特定项目领域并降低项目成本。对于铁路项目,基准测试对于比较主要成本动因(例如,隧道,桥梁等)的单位成本至关重要。此方法应用于本文所述的案例研究,这是丹麦第一个高速铁路项目, “ The New Line Copenhagen-Ringsted”。目的是通过寻找欧洲其他高速铁路建设和实施的最佳实践并从中汲取经验,从而避免成本超支,甚至减少最终预算成果。本文提出了与9个可比的铁路项目的基准哥本哈根-林格斯特项目。比较的结果提供了各种预算学科中成本范围的一定概述。从每公里总成本的角度来看,哥本哈根-林斯特德项目正处于该范围的中间,其学科比较中的价值与较便宜的项目的价值没有显着差异。对项目单位成本的深入分析仍在继续,但初步结果表明,位于同一地理区域的项目的成本价值相似。例如,这可以通过他们使用相同的建筑公司来解释。但是,南欧的单价低于北欧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号