首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of uncertainties in risk analysis of chemical establishments. The ASSURANCE project. Final summary report
【2h】

Assessment of uncertainties in risk analysis of chemical establishments. The ASSURANCE project. Final summary report

机译:评估化学企业风险分析的不确定性。 assURaNCE项目。最终总结报告

摘要

This report summarises the results obtained in the ASSURANCE project (EU contract number ENV4-CT97-0627). Seven teams have performed risk analyses for the same chemical facility, an ammonia storage. The EC's Joint Research Centre at Ispra and RisøNational Laboratory co-ordinated the exercise and led the comparison of results in order to reveal the causes for differences between the partners' results. The results of the project point to an increased awareness of the potential uncertainties in riskanalyses and highlight a number of important sources of such uncertainties. In the hazard identification phase it was revealed that the ranking of hazardous scenarios by probabilistic and deterministic approaches could result in completely differentconclusions. On the other hand, despite a large difference in frequency assessments of the same hazardous scenarios, there was good consensus on the ranking among the adherents of the probabilistic approach. Breaking down the modelling of both frequencyand consequence assessments into suitably small elements and conducting case studies allowed identifying root causes of uncertainty in the final risk assessments. Large differences were found in both the frequency assessments and in the assessment ofconsequences. The report gives a qualitative assessment of the importance to the final calculated risk of uncertainties in assumptions made, in the data and the calculation methods used. This assessment can serve as a guide to areas where, in particular,caution must be taken when performing risk analyses.
机译:本报告总结了ASSURANCE项目(欧盟合同号ENV4-CT97-0627)中获得的结果。七个团队对同一个化学设施(氨储存装置)进行了风险分析。 EC的Ispra联合研究中心和RisøNationalLaboratory联合进行了这项工作,并进行了结果比较,以揭示合作伙伴结果之间差异的原因。该项目的结果表明人们对风险分析中潜在不确定性的认识有所提高,并突出了此类不确定性的许多重要来源。在危害识别阶段,我们发现,通过概率和确定性方法对危害情景进行排序可能会得出完全不同的结论。另一方面,尽管在相同危险情况下进行频率评估的差异很大,但对于概率方法的拥护者之间的排名存在良好的共识。将频率和后果评估的模型分解为适当的小元素并进行案例研究,可以确定最终风险评估中不确定性的根本原因。在频率评估和后果评估中均发现较大差异。该报告对所用假设,所用数据和计算方法对最终计算出的不确定性风险的重要性进行了定性评估。该评估可以作为在进行风险分析时必须特别注意的领域的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号