首页> 外文OA文献 >3D ultrasound imaging performance of a row-column addressed 2D array transducer: a simulation study
【2h】

3D ultrasound imaging performance of a row-column addressed 2D array transducer: a simulation study

机译:行列寻址二维阵列换能器的三维超声成像性能:仿真研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper compares the imaging performance of a 128+128 element row-column addressed array with a fully addressed 1616 2D array. The comparison is made via simulations of the point spread function with Field II. Both arrays have lambda-pitch, a center frequency of 3:5MHz and use 256 active elements. The row-column addressed array uses 128 transmit channels and 128 receive channels, whereas the fully addressed array uses 256 channels in both transmit and receive. The large size of the emulated row and column elements in the row-column addressed array causes ghost echoes to appear. The ghost echoes are shown to be suppressed when the sub-elements within each of the emulated row and column elements are apodized. The maximum ghost intensity is suppressed by 22:2 dB compared to using no apodization. With apodization applied, the full-width-at-half-maximum in the lateral direction for the fully addressed array is 2:81mm, and 1:01mm for the row-column addressed array. This shows that the detail resolution can be more than doubled using the row-column addressed array instead of the fully addressed array. The row column addressed array achieves a R20 dB cystic resolution of 0:76mm, compared to 3:16mm for the fully addressed array. The signicantly smaller R20 dB-value for the row-column addressed array indicates that it can achieve a much higher contrast resolution than the fully addressed array.
机译:本文比较了具有完整寻址的1616 2D阵列的128 + 128元素行-列寻址阵列的成像性能。通过使用Field II对点扩展函数进行仿真来进行比较。两种阵列均具有λ间距,中心频率为3:5MHz,并使用256个有源元件。行列寻址的阵列使用128个发送通道和128个接收通道,而完全寻址的阵​​列在发送和接收中都使用256个通道。行列寻址数组中模拟的行和列元素的大小过大,导致出现幻像回波。当对每个模拟的行元素和列元素中的子元素进行切趾时,重影回波显示为被抑制。与不使用变迹相比,最大重影强度可降低22:2 dB。应用切趾处理后,完全寻址阵列的横向最大宽度为2:81mm,行列寻址阵列的最大宽度为1:01mm。这表明使用行列寻址阵列而不是完全寻址阵列可以将细节分辨率提高一倍以上。行列寻址阵列实现了0:76mm的R20 dB囊性分辨率,而全寻址阵列则为3:16mm。行列寻址阵列的R20 dB值明显较小,这表明它可以实现比完全寻址阵列高得多的对比度分辨率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号