首页> 外文OA文献 >Life-cycle and freshwater withdrawal impact assessment of water supply technologies
【2h】

Life-cycle and freshwater withdrawal impact assessment of water supply technologies

机译:供水技术的生命周期和淡水抽取影响评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Four alternative cases for water supply were environmentally evaluated and compared based on the standard environmental impact categories from the life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology extended with a freshwater withdrawal category (FWI). The cases were designed for Copenhagen, a part of Denmark with high population density and relatively low available water resources. FWI was applied at local groundwater catchments based on data from the national implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. The base case of the study was the current practice of groundwater abstraction from well fields situated near Copenhagen. The 4 cases studied were: Rain & stormwater harvesting from several blocks in the city; Today's groundwater abstraction with compensating actions applied in the affected freshwater environments to ensure sufficient water flow in water courses; Establishment of well fields further away from the city; And seawater desalination. The standard LCA showed that the Rain & stormwater harvesting case had the lowest overall environmental impact (81.9 μPET/m3) followed by the cases relying on groundwater abstraction (123.5–137.8 μPET/m3), and that desalination had a relatively small but still important increase in environmental impact (204.8 μPET/m3). Rain & stormwater harvesting and desalination had a markedly lower environmental impact compared to the base case, due to the reduced water hardness leading to e.g. a decrease in electricity consumption in households. For a relevant comparison, it is therefore essential to include the effects of water hardness when comparing the environmental impacts of water systems of different hardness. This study also emphasizes the necessity of including freshwater withdrawal respecting the relevant affected geographical scale, i.e. by focusing the assessment on the local groundwater catchments rather than on the regional catchments. Our work shows that freshwater withdrawal methods previously used on a regional level can also be applied to local groundwater catchments and integrated into the standard LCA as an impact category. When standard LCA is extended to include impacts of freshwater withdrawal, rain & stormwater and seawater (0.09–0.18 compared to 11.45–17.16 mPET/m3) were the resources resulting in least overall environmental impact.
机译:根据来自生命周期评估(LCA)方法的标准环境影响类别,对四种替代供水案例进行了环境评估和比较,并扩展了淡水抽取类别(FWI)。这些案例是为哥本哈根设计的,哥本哈根是丹麦的一部分,人口密度高,可用水资源相对较少。根据欧盟水框架指令在国家实施的数据,在当地地下水流域应用FWI。该研究的基础案例是目前从哥本哈根附近的井场抽取地下水的实践。研究的4个案例是:从该城市的几个街区收集雨水和雨水;当今的地下水提取方法是在受影响的淡水环境中采用补偿措施,以确保水道中有足够的水流;在远离城市的地方建立井田;和海水淡化。标准的LCA显示,雨水和雨水收集案例对环境的总体影响最低(81.9μPET/ m3),其次是依赖地下水抽取的案例(123.5–137.8μPET/ m3),而脱盐的影响相对较小,但仍然很重要增加对环境的影响(204.8μPET/ m3)。与基本情况相比,雨水和雨水的收集和脱盐对环境的影响明显降低,这是由于降低了水的硬度导致例如家庭用电量的减少。为了进行相关的比较,因此在比较不同硬度的水系统对环境的影响时,必须包括水硬度的影响。这项研究还强调了尊重相关受影响地理范围包括淡水抽取的必要性,即通过将评估重点放在当地地下水流域而不是区域流域。我们的工作表明,以前在区域级别使用的淡水抽取方法也可以应用于本地地下水集水区,并作为影响类别纳入标准LCA。当标准的LCA扩展到包括淡水抽取,雨水和雨水以及海水的影响(0.09–0.18与11.45–17.16 mPET / m3的影响)时,对整体环境的影响最小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号