首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative analysis of construction procurement systems based on transaction costs
【2h】

Comparative analysis of construction procurement systems based on transaction costs

机译:基于交易成本的施工采购系统比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Within construction procurement, Transaction cost economics (TCE), offers a mechanism to understand ‘unseen’ costs associated with the pre and post-contract work. Pre-contract, these include costs related to information gathering and procurement. Post-contract they include activities of contract administration and enforcement. This research investigates the relationship between procurement system and transaction costs (TCs) in the New Zealand construction industry, developing a theoretical model of relationship between procurement systems and TC. The model was operationalized and developed into a questionnaire. A cross-sectional sample approach was deployed, involving questionnaire survey, interviews, and research verification through ‘real world’ cases. Data was sought from professionals in management, design and operations (i.e. project managers, architects, engineers, quantity surveyors, and procurement officers). These professionals represented several construction organizations and NZ Councils (Auckland, Hamilton, Wellington, Christchurch, Dunedin). TCs were measured using time-spent conducting procurement related activities as a surrogate for cost. Professionals evaluated their time spent on procurement activities using a 5-point Likert scale, comparing the Traditional and Design-Build delivery systems. 96 responses (74 usable) were received from a sampled population of 360 (27% response). This data was triangulated with interviews to test and explain the model. The tests included Validity and Reliability Tests, Path Analysis, Regression Analysis, Factor Analysis, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The primary analytical technique used was Structural Equation Modelling to yield information on Goodness-of-Fit, model development and comparison, and confirmatory strategies. SPSS Amos 21 statistical software was used for data analysis and model development. The data demonstrated univariate and multivariate normality assumptions underlying SEM testing of research hypotheses. Of 43 hypotheses tested, six null hypotheses were rejected, demonstrating a positive relationship between the costs of information, procurement, administration, and enforcement with TCs. Additionally environmental uncertainties have indirect significant impact on TCs. The results suggest procurement systems have indirect impact on TCs, which is fully mediated by costs of information, procurement, administration, and enforcement. Finally, for research results verification, the models were applied to real-life cases (four Traditional, two Design-Build). TCs were calculated using regression equations based on factor loadings in the Traditional and Design-Build models. It was found that TCs in the Traditional system amounts to 18.5% of the annual salary cost of a project manager (as an indicator quantum), while in the Design-Build system, it amounts to 14.5% of the annual salary cost of a project manager. This study applies a new theoretical model for procurement selection based on TCs, investigating and empirically demonstrating the influence of procurement system on TCs in construction. It also offers a new plausible explanation for the factors influencing TCs in procurement. The findings have practical implications on construction business practice due to their robust empirical nature and theoretical framework, which might enhance the performance of the construction industry. The study contributes to the procurement selection in construction, by introducing a new conceptual model for the link between procurement systems and TCs. It has extended the current practices for procurement selection by estimating TCs for different procurement systems, specifically for the Traditional and Design-Build systems for comparison.This study emphasizes ‘in-house’ TCs from the perspective of the client, consequently the study recommends that the work be expanded to determine the ‘out-of-house’ TCs from the contractor perspective. Furthermore that to expand the relevance of the findings further work using the same methodology should be used to measure TCs for other procurement systems for comparison purposes. Finally, this study calculates TCs within projects, so it was recommended to further explore intra-organizational TCs in construction.
机译:在建筑采购中,交易成本经济学(TCE)提供了一种机制来了解与合同前和合同后工作相关的“看不见的”成本。合同前,其中包括与信息收集和采购有关的费用。合同后,它们包括合同管理和执行的活动。这项研究调查了新西兰建筑业中采购系统与交易成本(TC)之间的关系,建立了采购系统与TC之间关系的理论模型。该模型已投入运行,并已开发成调查表。部署了横断面样本方法,包括问卷调查,访谈和对“现实世界”案例的研究验证。数据来自于管理,设计和运营方面的专业人员(即项目经理,建筑师,工程师,工料测量师和采购人员)。这些专业人员代表了几个建筑组织和新西兰议会(奥克兰,汉密尔顿,惠灵顿,基督城,但尼丁)。 TC是使用花费的时间进行采购相关活动作为成本的替代品来衡量的。专业人士使用5点李克特量表评估了他们在采购活动上花费的时间,并比较了传统和设计建造交付系统。从360个样本人群中获得了96个响应(74个可用)(27%响应)。该数据通过访谈进行了三角测量,以测试和解释该模型。测试包括有效性和可靠性测试,路径分析,回归分析,因子分析和结构方程模型(SEM)。使用的主要分析技术是结构方程模型,以得出有关拟合优度,模型开发和比较以及确定性策略的信息。 SPSS Amos 21统计软件用于数据分析和模型开发。数据证明了研究假设的SEM测试的单变量和多变量正态性假设。在测试的43个假设中,有6个无效假设被拒绝,表明信息成本,采购,管理和执行技术委员会之间的正相关关系。此外,环境不确定性对TC有间接的重大影响。结果表明,采购系统对技术合作有间接影响,这完全由信息,采购,行政和执法的成本来调节。最后,为了验证研究结果,将模型应用于实际案例(四个传统案例,两个设计构建案例)。 TC是根据传统模型和设计构建模型中基于因素负荷的回归方程式计算得出的。发现传统系统中的TC占项目经理年薪成本的18.5%(作为指标),而在Design-Build系统中,TC占项目年薪成本的14.5%。经理。这项研究为基于TC的采购选择提供了一种新的理论模型,调查和经验证明了采购系统对建筑中TC的影响。它还为影响采购中TC的因素提供了新的合理解释。由于其强大的经验性质和理论框架,这些发现对建筑业的业务实践具有实际意义,这可能会提高建筑业的绩效。该研究通过为采购系统和TC之间的联系引入新的概念模型,为建筑中的采购选择做出了贡献。它通过估计不同采购系统的TC来扩展当前的采购选择实践,特别是针对传统和设计建造系统进行比较,此研究从客户的角度强调了``内部''TC,因此该研究建议扩大工作范围,从承包商的角度确定“外部” TC。此外,为了扩大调查结果的相关性,应使用使用相同方法的进一步工作来衡量其他采购系统的TC,以进行比较。最后,本研究计算项目内的TC,因此建议进一步探索组织内部的TC。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rajeh Mohammed;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号