首页> 外文OA文献 >Digital forensic process model for mobile business devices: smart technologies
【2h】

Digital forensic process model for mobile business devices: smart technologies

机译:移动商务设备的数字取证流程模型:智能技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Worldwide usage of mobile SMART devices has been dramatically increased over the past decade. The popularity of these devices has also grown as a result of the increase in terms of their processing power, large storage capacity and large memory. Mobile SMART devices such as SMART phones, tablet, phaplets and Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) are now very common and very much part of most businesses’ network. As a result, these devices hold enormous amounts of both personal and private business data. Consequently, they have become the target for criminals. They have been found to be involved in criminal activities particularly cybercrimes. These devices are often seized as part of a criminal investigation, and this has led to the need to acquire the data contained in these devices. The SMART device data has become potential evidence in criminal cases.The vital information held by these mobile SMART devices trigger the need for mobile SMART device forensic capability. The primary aim of digital forensic is to identify the digital information and capture all potential evidence in the device, including call logs, phone book data, text messages, and so on. This process is very important therefore, potential evidence must not be altered in the process so it can be admissible in a court of law. This requires following standardised investigation procedures. However, there is currently no standardised digital forensic investigation process model for SMART devices. Yet, there are a number of digital investigation process models available. However, they were either developed for a specific sub-field such as computer forensics, mobile forensics, and network forensics or, a generic digital forensic investigation model. This study is aimed to fill the gap identified in the literature; there is no investigation process model that can be used on an investigation that involves multi-disciplinary requirements. The question raised here is “What can be done to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of digital forensic investigation for SMART devices?” this question will be answered in chapter seven. This study involves developing of a new digital forensic investigation process model and a framework. To answer the research question and make sure that the new artefact is evaluated and refined to a high standard, the Design Science (DS) research method is employed to guide the study. DS method defines the processes from identifying and defining of the problem to communicating the findings through scholarly and professional publications. The DS method influences the design of the study and the evaluation methodology employed to evaluate the artefact which is done in the fifth phase of the DS research method. As a result, this study found that the problem and the gap identified in the literature are real because digital forensics has a complex nature and it needs multi-disciplinary capabilities and abilities. The implication is that for a SMART device – that brings convergence of many segregated areas - investigation knowledge from each of the implicated areas will be required for effective and efficient investigations. As a result, this study found that employing the current investigation process models in an investigation in a multi-disciplinary environment, the effectiveness and efficiency of the investigation is compromised. The completed study contributes to the body of knowledge in the field of digital forensics when a multi-disciplinary investigation process model is required that will help an investigator in an environment where more than one sub-field of digital forensics is present. The experimental test data was analysed and the results were used to improve the multi-disciplinary model and develop a multi-disciplinary investigation framework that can be continuously improved as technology and devices change. The professional significance is for improvement in the effectiveness and efficiency of digital forensic investigation processes in a multi-disciplinary environment.
机译:在过去的十年中,全球移动SMART设备的使用已大大增加。这些设备的处理能力,大存储容量和大内存的增加也使这些设备的受欢迎程度得到了提高。移动SMART设备(例如SMART电话,平板电脑,手机和个人数字助理(PDA))现在非常普遍,并且在大多数企业的网络中占很大一部分。结果,这些设备保存了大量的个人和私人业务数据。因此,它们已成为犯罪分子的目标。他们被发现参与犯罪活动,特别是网络犯罪。这些设备通常是作为刑事调查的一部分被扣押的,这导致需要获取这些设备中包含的数据。 SMART设备数据已成为刑事案件中的潜在证据。这些移动SMART设备保存的重要信息触发了对移动SMART设备取证功能的需求。数字取证的主要目的是识别数字信息并捕获设备中的所有潜在证据,包括通话记录,电话簿数据,文本消息等。因此,此过程非常重要,在此过程中不得更改潜在证据,以便可以在法庭上接受。这需要遵循标准化的调查程序。但是,目前还没有用于SMART设备的标准化数字取证调查过程模型。但是,有许多可用的数字调查过程模型。但是,它们要么是为特定子领域(例如计算机取证,移动取证和网络取证)开发的,要么是通用的数字取证调查模型。这项研究旨在填补文献中确定的空白。没有可用于涉及多学科要求的调查的调查过程模型。这里提出的问题是“可以采取什么措施来提高SMART设备的数字取证调查的有效性和效率?”第七章将回答这个问题。这项研究涉及开发新的数字取证调查过程模型和框架。为了回答研究问题并确保对新的人工制品进行评估并将其精炼成高标准,采用设计科学(DS)研究方法来指导研究。 DS方法定义了从识别和定义问题到通过学术和专业出版物传达发现结果的过程。 DS方法影响研究的设计和用于评估伪像的评估方法,该方法是在DS研究方法的第五阶段完成的。结果,本研究发现问题和文献中存在的差距是真实的,因为数字取证具有复杂的性质,并且需要多学科的能力。这意味着对于SMART设备-它带来了许多隔离区域的融合-为了有效而高效的调查,需要来自每个涉及区域的调查知识。结果,该研究发现,在多学科环境中的调查中采用当前的调查过程模型会降低调查的有效性和效率。当需要一种多学科的调查过程模型时,如果需要一个存在多个数字取证领域的环境中的研究者,则完成的研究将有助于数字取证领域的知识体系。分析了实验测试数据,并将结果用于改进多学科模型并开发了多学科研究框架,该框架可以随着技术和设备的变化而不断改进。专业意义在于在多学科环境中提高数字取证调查过程的有效性和效率。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lutui Paula Raymond;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号