首页> 外文OA文献 >Preventing wild boar 'Sus scrofa' damage - considerations for wild boar management in highly fragmented agroecosystems
【2h】

Preventing wild boar 'Sus scrofa' damage - considerations for wild boar management in highly fragmented agroecosystems

机译:防止野猪“sus scrofa”损害 - 在高度分散的农业生态系统中考虑野猪管理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During the last three decades wild boar populations have grown rapidly and the range of the species has increased steadily, covering almost the whole European continent today. The huge spread of the wild boar and the high population densities pose major problems, particularly to agriculture. Wild boars cause considerable damage to fields and grassland, but also pose a potentially high threat to livestock, as carrier of the pathogen of the classical swine fever, which may be transmitted to domestic pigs and can cause huge losses. To prevent economic problems by high wild boar populations, an effective wild boar management has to be established. Besides the regulation of the populations by means of hunting, vulnerable crop fields have to be protected adequately. Crop protection is usually achieved by the use of electric fences. Alternatively, various methods are available that claim effective deterrence of wild boars, however, most of which lacking scientific proof of effectiveness.udududThis thesis, based on a field study conducted in the Canton Basel-Land, northwestern Switzerland, presents research results on the effectiveness of three different deterrent systems: solar-powered blinkers, an odour repellent, and a gustatory repellent. The aims of the study were: (1) to investigate three means to deter wild boars from agricultural land representative for other deterrents based on optic, olfactory, or gustatory effects; (2) to provide relevant and evidence-based data, which contribute to the policy and practice of wild boar management and damage prevention in the Canton Basel-Land, also applicable to other regions. I discussed the results in a broader context, also considering the role of hunting in damage prevention. udududSolar blinkers and the odour repellent, which were investigated at baited luring sites, reduced the probability of wild boar visits by 8.1% and by 0.4% respectively. Both deterrents were not effective in preventing wild boars from accessing the lure food. Additionally, we did not find any initial deterrence effect. The gustatory repellent, which was investigated in experimental fields, did not have a significant effect on the frequency of damage events. Although we observed a slight trend towards a damage reduction, the results show, that the repellent was not able to prevent damage. We further could not detect any area avoidance by the wild boars as a response to the repellent.udududThe present study revealed, that none of the deterrents investigated was able to prevent wild boars from entering the experimental sites. Hence the deterrents in question are no effective means for field protection. Moreover, I suggest that any other deterrent basing on startling response, neophobia, fear-evocation, or conditioned avoidance would not be effective in preventing wild boars from entering agricultural land. To date, the only recommendable means for damage prevention is the electric fence, which should be taken into account by the responsible authorities. Based on the findings of the present study, farmers must be discouraged from the use of other deterrents than electric fences to protect their fields. Additionally, damage compensation should be subject to the condition of fencing of the fields. udBesides the protection of vulnerable crops the reduction of wild boar populations by means of hunting is crucial for damage prevention. Hunting rates have to be increased and hunting effort should focus on females of all age classes, but especially on juvenile females, which have shown to be highly reproductive and substantially contribute to population growth. For this purpose, selective hunting techniques like hide hunting and stalk hunting should be prioritised and promoted.udThe highly reproductive wild boar possesses the ability to recover from population losses in a very short time. Hence, both effective hunting management and field protection will remain the most important tools for damage control. Further research is required to investigate and compare different wild boar management systems including also damage prevention under an economic perspective. Stakeholders like farmers, hunters, and authorities must be involved.ududThe omnivore wild boar is enabled to adapt to various environments. Wild boar populations are expected to increase further and to spread into areas not yet populated. In Switzerland, the spread into the central parts of the country will also be supported by additional wildlife crossings that are in construction or in process of planning which will pose a challenge for wildlife management in these regions.
机译:在过去的三十年中,野猪种群迅速增长,其种类范围稳步增加,几乎覆盖了整个欧洲大陆。野猪的广泛传播和高人口密度带来了重大问题,特别是对农业而言。野猪对田地和草原造成相当大的破坏,但作为经典猪瘟病原体的载体,也可能对牲畜构成高威胁,这种病可能会传播给家猪,并可能造成巨大损失。为了防止高野猪种群引起的经济问题,必须建立有效的野猪管理。除了通过狩猎调节人口之外,还必须充分保护脆弱的农田。通常通过使用电围栏来实现作物保护。另外,也有各种方法可以有效地威慑野猪,但是,大多数方法都缺乏科学的有效性证明。 ud ud ud本论文基于在瑞士西北部的巴塞尔州坎顿进行的实地研究,提出了对三种不同的威慑系统的有效性的研究结果:太阳能眨眼器,驱臭剂和味觉驱除剂。该研究的目的是:(1)研究基于视觉,嗅觉或味觉影响从农业用地代表阻止其他公害的野猪的三种方法; (2)提供相关且基于证据的数据,这些数据有助于巴塞尔州野猪管理和预防损害的政策和实践,也适用于其他地区。我在更广泛的范围内讨论了结果,同时考虑了狩猎在预防损害中的作用。在诱饵诱饵场所对日光眨眼和驱臭剂的研究分别使野猪造访的可能性降低了8.1%和0.4%。两种威慑剂都无法有效阻止野猪获取诱饵食物。此外,我们没有发现任何初始威慑作用。在实验领域中研究的味觉驱避剂对破坏事件的频率没有显着影响。尽管我们观察到了减少损害的轻微趋势,但结果表明,驱虫剂无法防止损害。我们进一步无法检测到野猪对驱避剂的反应。 ud ud ud本研究表明,所研究的所有阻吓剂均无法阻止野猪进入实验地点。因此,所涉及的威慑力量不是用于现场保护的有效手段。此外,我建议以惊吓反应,新恐惧症,恐惧唤起或有条件回避为基础的任何其他威慑措施都不能有效地防止野猪进入农田。迄今为止,唯一推荐的防止损坏的方法是电围栏,相关主管部门应予以考虑。根据本研究的结果,必须劝阻农民不要使用除电子围栏以外的其他威慑措施来保护自己的土地。另外,损害赔偿应受田野围栏条件的约束。 ud除了保护脆弱的农作物外,通过狩猎减少野猪种群对于预防损害至关重要。必须提高狩猎率,狩猎工作应集中在所有年龄段的女性上,但尤其要着重于未成年女性,后者已被证明具有很高的生殖能力,并为人口增长做出了重要贡献。为此,应优先考虑并推广选择性狩猎技术,例如生皮狩猎和茎秆狩猎。 ud高繁殖力的野猪具有在很短的时间内从种群损失中恢复过来的能力。因此,有效的狩猎管理和野外保护将仍然是控制损害的最重要工具。需要进行进一步的研究以调查和比较不同的野猪管理系统,包括从经济角度出发也要防止损害。诸如农民,猎人和当局等利益相关者必须参与其中。 ud ud杂食性野猪能够适应各种环境。野猪的数量有望进一步增加,并传播到尚未有人居住的地区。在瑞士,蔓延到该国中部的还将得到正在建设中或正在规划中的其他野生动物过境点的支持,这将对这些地区的野生动植物管理构成挑战。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schlageter Adrian;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号