首页> 外文OA文献 >A qualitative study of avian influenza A H5N1 at the human-animal interface: examining constructions of risk and associated behaviours of people who work with poultry in three live birdmarkets in Indonesia
【2h】

A qualitative study of avian influenza A H5N1 at the human-animal interface: examining constructions of risk and associated behaviours of people who work with poultry in three live birdmarkets in Indonesia

机译:人类 - 动物界面禽流感a H5N1的定性研究:检查印度尼西亚三个活禽市场中与家禽一起工作的人的风险和相关行为的构建

摘要

This thesis draws on the notion of disease narratives to examine the manner in which people who work with poultry (PWP) in live bird markets (LBMs) construct risks associated with avian influenza A H5N1, as well as how these constructions of risk inform behaviours at the human-animal interface. Focusing on PWP in three live bird markets in Indonesia, this qualitative study employs a constructivist perspective to look at what informs PWP’s constructions of risk about avian influenza in relation to themselves, their animals, their livelihoods, and the political authorities within their communities, and offers insight into the extent to which these constructions of risk underpin their behaviours. Although not strictly designed as a comparative study, this research draws out similarities and differences across the three fieldsites.udFindings suggest that PWP assess risk by drawing on experiential knowledge and observations. Respondents across the three sites suggest a theory of species-specific infection in relation to H5N1, which broadly posits that there are certain diseases that infect different types of poultry and certain diseases that infect humans. For most PWP, diseases in birds are not considered contagious, even between different species, and the possibility of zoonosis implausible. The majority of respondents conclude that humans are not susceptible to poultry diseases because their observations and experiences do not support such a conclusion. PWP do, however, indicate that other forms of risk, such as the risk that a disease outbreak or an intervention can threaten their livelihood are plausible and salient. Behaviours of PWP at the human-animal interface reflect their constructions of risk, in that they prioritize economic considerations over any concern for mitigating the risk of disease in poultry or in people.udThis thesis concludes by outlining policy implications and researchable hypotheses, and in highlighting the benefits as well as the challenges of integrating qualitative, social science research into the interdisciplinary, collaborative study of emerging infectious diseases.
机译:本文使用疾病叙述的概念来研究活禽市场(LBM)中与家禽劳动者(PWP)构成与A型H5N1禽流感相关的风险的方式,以及这些风险的构造如何告知人类行为人与动物的界面。这项定性研究以印度尼西亚三个活禽市场中的PWP为重点,以建构主义的眼光看待是什么使PWP构造有关自身,动物,生计和所在社区内政治当局的禽流感风险构造;以及提供有关这些风险构建在多大程度上支持其行为的见解。尽管没有严格设计为比较研究,但这项研究得出了三个现场的异同。 ud发现表明,PWP可通过经验知识和观察来评估风险。这三个地点的受访者都提出了一种与H5N1有关的物种特异性感染的理论,该理论广泛地提出,某些疾病会感染不同类型的家禽,某些疾病会感染人类。对于大多数PWP,即使在不同物种之间,鸟类的疾病也不会被认为具有传染性,而且人畜共患病的可能性令人难以置信。大多数受访者得出结论,人类不易感染禽类疾病,因为他们的观察和经验并不支持这一结论。但是,PWP确实表明,其他形式的风险是合理且突出的,例如疾病暴发或干预措施可能威胁其生计的风险。 PWP在人畜界面上的行为反映了它们的风险构造,因为它们将经济考虑因素放在优先考虑降低家禽或人中疾病风险的任何考虑因素上。 ud本文的结论是通过概述政策含义和可研究的假设来总结的。强调将定性的社会科学研究纳入新兴传染病的跨学科协作研究的好处和挑战。

著录项

  • 作者

    Naysmith Scott;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号