首页> 外文OA文献 >The United Nations Security Council’s agenda on ‘Women, Peace and Security’: bureaucratic pathologies and unrealised potential
【2h】

The United Nations Security Council’s agenda on ‘Women, Peace and Security’: bureaucratic pathologies and unrealised potential

机译:联合国安理会关于“妇女,和平与安全”的议程:官僚主义的病态和未实现的潜力

摘要

Considered the single greatest achievement in ‘engendering’ global security policy, UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (SCR 1325) is celebrated as a triumph of women’s peace movements and transnational feminist organizing. My central claim is that SCR 1325 has both over performed and under delivered. The remarkable achievements it catalysed in establishing new international standards have not been fully appreciated, explored, or understood, while its successful utilisation by women rights and peace activists in the context of 'informal peace building' has not fundamentally challenged the workings of the Security Council itself, as feminists had hoped. This has resulted in an overestimation of SCR 1325’s symbolic and practical importance, and an underestimation of the broader institutional and geopolitical factors that shaped SCR 1325’s genesis and continue to drive Security Council decision-making in relation to women and gender issues.udI suggest that SCR 1325’s perceived failures have less to do with its oft-criticized textual content than with the institutions, actors, strategies, and processes that have been most central to its implementation. Historically, the geopolitics of UN decision-making on gender issues demonstrate an extreme form of bureaucratic pathology that has circumscribed opportunities for bringing gender issues onto the UN’s peace and security agenda. I introduce the concept of ‘relegation’ to explain why decision-making on women has been extrinsic to the UN mechanisms and entities that have the greatest potential for autonomous action. SCR 1325’s implementation failures also reflect the absence of a collaborative feminist epistemic community of research and praxis in the nascent field of feminist security studies. This has further limited the UN’s ability to internalise, institutionalise, and implement actions that advance, rather than undermine feminist peace building agendas.
机译:联合国安理会第1325号决议(SCR 1325)被认为是“实施”全球安全政策中的最大成就,是对妇女和平运动和跨国女权主义组织的胜利表示欢迎。我的主要主张是SCR 1325的性能过高和交付不足。它在建立新的国际标准方面所催化的显著成就尚未得到充分的欣赏,探索或理解,尽管妇女权利和和平主义者在“非正式和平建设”的背景下成功利用了它,但并没有从根本上挑战安全理事会的工作。正如女权主义者所希望的那样。这导致高估了SCR 1325的象征性和实际重要性,而低估了影响SCR 1325起源并继续推动安全理事会关于妇女和性别问题的决策的更广泛的体制和地缘政治因素。 udI建议SCR 1325认为的失败与其经常被批评的文本内容无关,而与对其实施最重要的机构,参与者,策略和过程无关。从历史上看,联合国关于性别问题的决策的地缘政治表现出一种极端的官僚病态形式,这种形式限制了将性别问题纳入联合国和平与安全议程的机会。我将介绍“降级”的概念,以解释为什么对妇女的决策对那些具有最大自主权的联合国机制和实体来说是外在的。 SCR 1325的实施失败还反映出在女权主义安全研究的新生领域中缺乏协作的女权主义认识论研究和实践社区。这进一步限制了联合国进行内在化,制度化和实施能够推进而不是破坏女权主义和平建设议程的行动的能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Klot Jennifer;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号