首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of international aid in Nelson Mandela Bay and Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa
【2h】

Evaluation of international aid in Nelson Mandela Bay and Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa

机译:评估南非东开普省纳尔逊曼德拉湾和布法罗市大都市的国际援助

摘要

International Aid or Official Development Assistance (ODA), especially its implementation and effectiveness, has long been and continues to be a vigorously contested matter amongst the stakeholders in the development arena. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ODA in two municipalities in the Eastern Cape – Buffalo City and Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipalities – during the period 2005–2010. This period coincided with the introduction of the Paris Declaration (PD), an intervention intended to improve the ODA or Aid landscape globally. This was also the period during which the so-called service delivery protests in almost all municipalities in South Africa escalated. A diversified methodology including both quantitative and qualitative approaches was used in this study while adhering to the evaluation framework of the Paris Declaration as recommended by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This framework put special focus on the five principles of ownership, alignment, harmonisation, managing for results and mutual accountability. Of particular significance in this study is the special attention paid to the actual beneficiaries on the ground, namely the communities, which is contrary to most existing Paris Declaration evaluations. The research findings suggested that there had been no conscious efforts to implement the Paris Declaration in the two municipalities that were investigated. Furthermore, the prevailing weaknesses in governance, coupled with both administrative and operational paralysis in these two institutions, provided for less than fertile ground for this intervention to thrive.The findings also highlighted that ODA programmes were very poorly known by most stakeholders, especially the communities who were supposed to benefit directly from this assistance. These results also underscored the partisan nature of ODA and how it influenced the perceptions of the various key players. The success and future of ODA programmes in South Africa, particularly in municipalities, will largely rely on “Active Citizenry”. Although ODA’s contribution to South Africa seems negligible in monetary terms, its significance lies among others in the innovations, piloting, risk mitigation, catalytic initiatives and capacity development it introduces or generates and which need to be correctly exploited, implemented and maximised. ODA in South Africa should therefore focus at the local level, the municipalities, which represent the interface between the citizens and the state. To ensure that the ensuing innovations are optimally cascaded down in an organised and effective manner to where they are mostly needed, ODA should preferably operate at the strategic level in municipalities. This would in turn assist in counteracting the current high levels of poverty and inequality in the country. Study findings further suggest that South Africa should cease its current ambivalence regarding ODA and refrain from the so-called “Triangular” ODA in support of the rest of Africa. The demands in it’s own back yard are steadily mounting. This is clearly reflected by the continuous service delivery protests and instability in several municipalities in South Africa.
机译:长期以来,国际援助或官方发展援助(ODA),尤其是其实施和有效性,一直是发展领域利益相关者中激烈争论的问题。这项研究的目的是评估2005-2010年期间,东开普省两个城市(布法罗市和纳尔逊·曼德拉大都会市)官方发展援助的有效性。这一时期恰逢《巴黎宣言》(PD)的出台,这是一项旨在改善全球官方发展援助或援助状况的干预措施。在这段时间里,南非几乎所有城市的所谓服务交付抗议都在升级。这项研究采用了包括定量和定性方法在内的多样化方法,同时遵循了经济合作与发展组织(OECD)建议的《巴黎宣言》评估框架。该框架特别关注所有权,统一性,协调性,成果管理和相互问责这五个原则。在这项研究中特别重要的是,要特别注意当地的实际受益人,即社区,这与大多数现有的《巴黎宣言》评估背道而驰。研究结果表明,在被调查的两个城市中,没有自觉地努力执行《巴黎宣言》。此外,治理方面普遍存在的弱点,加上这两个机构的行政和业务瘫痪,为这种干预措施的蓬勃发展提供了不肥沃的土壤。调查结果还突出表明,大多数利益相关者,特别是社区对ODA计划的了解很少应该从这项援助中直接受益的人。这些结果还强调了官方发展援助的党派性质,以及它如何影响各主要参与者的看法。在南非,特别是在市政当局中,官方发展援助计划的成功与未来将在很大程度上取决于“积极的公民身份”。尽管官方发展援助对南非的贡献在货币上似乎可以忽略不计,但其意义尤其在于它引入或产生的创新,试点,减轻风险,促进倡议和能力发展,需要正确地加以利用,实施和最大化。因此,南非的官方发展援助应侧重于地方一级的市政当局,这代表了公民与国家之间的联系。为了确保随后的创新以有组织和有效的方式最佳地降级到最需要的地方,官方发展援助最好应该在市政当局的战略层面上运作。反过来,这将有助于抵消该国目前的高度贫困和不平等现象。研究结果进一步表明,南非应停止对ODA的当前矛盾情绪,避免使用所谓的“三角” ODA来支持非洲其他地区。自家后院的需求正在稳步增加。南非几个城市的持续提供服务的抗议活动和不稳定,清楚地反映了这一点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lwanga-Iga Ivan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号