首页> 外文OA文献 >An investigation into the learnability of object-oriented case tools for computing education
【2h】

An investigation into the learnability of object-oriented case tools for computing education

机译:面向对象的计算机教学案例工具的可学习性研究

摘要

The use of Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE) tools for teaching object-oriented systems analysis and design (OOSAD) has many potential benefits, but there are also several problems associated with the usage of these tools. A large portion of these problems relate to the usability and learnability of these tools. Learnability is one of the most important attributes of usability and refers to the capability of the system to enable the user to learn its application. The main research question that this study aims to address is “How can the learnability of OO CASE tools for computing education in South Africa be evaluated?”. In order to answer this question several frameworks for evaluating CASE tool usability and learnability were investigated. One of these frameworks, as proposed by Senapathi, was selected as being the most appropriate for evaluating CASE tool learnability for computing education. This framework maintains that the learnability of a CASE tool is dependent on context of use factors such as the tool used, as well as user characteristics such as gender. The primary aim of this research was thus to validate Senapathi's framework for CASE tool learnability in a South African context. A secondary aim of the research was to extend the implementation of the framework in order to enable the comparison of two CASE tools and to support the inclusion of other user characteristics. An experiment was performed at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) in 2006. The participants recruited for this experiment were second year computing students at NMMU. During this experiment, the learnability of two OO CASE tools, namely IBM's Rational Software Modeller and Microsoft's Visio, was evaluated and compared. The quantitative and qualitative results supported Senapathi's results and showed that her framework could be used to evaluate CASE tool learnability and could be adapted to evaluate two CASE tools. The results also showed that the majority of the participants rated the learnability of Microsoft Visio higher for both tasks and that the main reasons participants preferred Visio was due to its simplicity, familiarity and recoverability.
机译:使用计算机辅助软件工程(CASE)工具进行面向对象的系统分析和设计(OOSAD)的教学具有许多潜在的好处,但是与使用这些工具相关的还有一些问题。这些问题很大一部分与这些工具的可用性和可学习性有关。可学习性是可用性的最重要属性之一,是指系统使用户能够学习其应用程序的能力。这项研究旨在解决的主要研究问题是“如何评估面向南非的计算教育的OO CASE工具的可学习性?”。为了回答这个问题,研究了几种评估CASE工具可用性和可学习性的框架。由Senapathi提出的这些框架之一被选为最适合评估CASE工具对计算机教育的学习能力的框架。该框架认为,CASE工具的可学习性取决于使用因素(例如所使用的工具)的上下文以及用户特征(例如性别)。因此,本研究的主要目的是验证南非环境下Senapathi CASE工具可学习性的框架。研究的第二个目的是扩展框架的实现,以便能够比较两个CASE工具并支持包含其他用户特征。 2006年在纳尔逊·曼德拉城市大学(NMMU)进行了一项实验。该实验招募的参与者是NMMU的二年级计算机专业学生。在此实验期间,评估并比较了两个OO CASE工具(IBM的Rational Software Modeller和Microsoft的Visio)的可学习性。定量和定性的结果支持Senapathi的结果,并表明她的框架可用于评估CASE工具的可学习性,并可适用于评估两种CASE工具。结果还表明,大多数参与者对Microsoft Visio的可学习性都比较满意,并且他们偏爱Visio的主要原因是其简单,熟悉和可恢复性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scholtz Brenda Mary;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号